Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm going on 77 years old. For the first time, i fear our Supreme Court. [View all]bluestarone
(17,360 posts)52. In my eyes YES. Pretty plain to me what she is doing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm going on 77 years old. For the first time, i fear our Supreme Court. [View all]
bluestarone
Apr 27
OP
This SCOTUS does not operate in the best interests of the country, but rather with some as political hacks!
RKP5637
Apr 27
#2
Well, all i know for sure is, When we get control of the white house the senate and the house
bluestarone
Apr 27
#11
A law to protect stare decisis would mean no chance to overturn Dobbs, Heller, Bruen, or Citizens United.
onenote
Apr 28
#46
Thomas and Alito are desperate to retire. They won't while there is a Democratic president and Senate.
Earth-shine
Apr 27
#8
Agreed. And remember SC Smith asked them to rule on his immunity claim in December of last year...
brush
Apr 27
#10
There is one thing thou...they know there's only room at the top for one in a dictatorship.
PortTack
Apr 27
#19
do they really have religious beliefs that they are promoting or is their "beliefs" merely a cover
rurallib
Apr 28
#69
I'm not saying she hasn't been dragging her feet. But the immunity case hasn't been the reason.
onenote
Apr 28
#55
Well, that's where she is at today. Won't disagree with she started that a long time ago, BUT
bluestarone
Apr 28
#56
There's a pending motion based raising immunity. She hasn't ruled on it, but has continued to rule on other motions.
onenote
Apr 28
#57
Isn't it our hope that a different Supreme Court in the future will be making rules for all of us?
onenote
Apr 28
#63
"Then they came for women's rights, and I did not speak out because I was not a woman."
Marcuse
Apr 27
#26
Have never felt so pessimistic in my life, and I've lived 75 years of ups and downs n this country.
Lonestarblue
Apr 27
#30
The purpose of this Subversive Court is to subvert democracy and our Constitution.
Hermit-The-Prog
Apr 27
#31
Way past this. THIS supreme court has already taken care of our democracy, in my eyes.
bluestarone
Apr 28
#51
Nothing. Just like nothing could be done if the Supreme Court decided tomorrow all Republicans had to have abortions.
onenote
Apr 28
#58
Problem is, they WILL NOT rule Republicans have to have abortions BUT they WILL
bluestarone
Apr 28
#62
Some polls have shown that swing voters have said that they would not vote for Trump if he is convicted.
Lonestarblue
Apr 28
#59
Folks tend to put great stock in polls that tell them what they want to hear and less in polls that don't.
onenote
Apr 28
#60