Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Celerity

(44,286 posts)

5. Going back to 'the way it was before' is/was not the only other choice/option. That is a false binary dilemma.

Reply to Oopsie Daisy (Reply #4)

Tue Apr 30, 2024, 07:33 AM

Apr 30

We could have actual net neurality, or at least far closer to that than we are with the new regulations, which allow for the violation of its core principles.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Net Neutrality in Name Only? [View all] Celerity Apr 30 OP

Thanks for posting this. Elessar Zappa Apr 30 #1

Oh no. It's not perfect. Oopsie Daisy Apr 30 #2

These kinds of ISP-controlled fast lanes violate core net neutrality principles and would limit user choice, distort Celerity Apr 30 #3

Heavens! Oopsie Daisy Apr 30 #4

Going back to 'the way it was before' is/was not the only other choice/option. That is a false binary dilemma. Celerity Apr 30 #5

Not good enough! Perfect or nothing, I always say! Oopsie Daisy Apr 30 #6

I have already responded to all this. We are clearly not going to agree. Celerity Apr 30 #7

Nonsense! We're in perfect agreement! Oopsie Daisy Apr 30 #8

Powerful interests gaming the system for additional profit. justaprogressive Apr 30 #9