General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: On "Bitch" and other Misogynist language [View all]Panasonic
(2,921 posts)Jury results here:
At Tue Nov 27, 2012, 01:12 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Great post.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1889687
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
Other posts routinely get hidden for use of this language. Even in this very thread. Posters have been PPRd fir it. Either it is acceptable or its not
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Nov 27, 2012, 01:18 PM, and the Jury voted 5-1 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: Juvenile behavior. Just seeing how far they can push the envelope.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said:
Hide this childish image.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: This is not very appropriate for GD.
We lost HopeHoops yesterday because of that, and we don't need to lose any more.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
--
It was an appropriate alert, IMHO.
I was juror #5.