Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Silent Type

(5,645 posts)
31. Warren's wealth tax would barely cover a months worth of our annual Deficit, much less do anything about Debt or
Fri May 10, 2024, 08:13 PM
May 2024

healthcare, infrastructure, jobs, education, climate, childcare, etc.

Houston, we have a problem. [View all] onecaliberal May 2024 OP
I guess I wonder what the "problem" is TexasDem69 May 2024 #1
HMMM, what could be corrected to allievate this situation? FHRRK May 2024 #3
Educate me TexasDem69 May 2024 #7
End corporate welfare in the form MadameButterfly May 2024 #8
Awesome post. Thank you! dmr May 2024 #19
Thanks! MadameButterfly May 2024 #21
Super excellent list. Problem is... Justice matters. May 2024 #46
Almost impossible and almost true MadameButterfly May 2024 #54
I admire your measured optimism. It's what we need more than anything these days . . . Journeyman May 2024 #63
a perfect brilliant common sense quote for a time of fake news, cult worship, and pessimism MadameButterfly May 2024 #75
Excellent post. Thanks. c-rational May 2024 #51
Just so you know. Brenda May 2024 #64
Yes, agreed MadameButterfly May 2024 #79
How does net neutrality fit into this? onenote May 2024 #66
If service is faster or better for the rich or other priveledged people MadameButterfly May 2024 #77
Compliments 90-percent May 2024 #68
The problem isn't that we have "tax breaks and loopholes." jmowreader May 2024 #69
Some deductions are good and created for the good of society MadameButterfly May 2024 #76
Progressive taxation, which we had until Reagan. mjvpi May 2024 #10
But the wealth is generally not taxable under current code. erronis May 2024 #12
So we need to restructure the tax code so they can't do that MadameButterfly May 2024 #16
Warren's wealth tax would barely cover a months worth of our annual Deficit, much less do anything about Debt or Silent Type May 2024 #31
The solution is a Financial Transaction Tax - read Ellen Browns article below to understand it. airplaneman May 2024 #57
Fascinating MadameButterfly May 2024 #59
Would love for us to find a tax that would pay for everything. But Brookings says a 0.1% FTT would raise $80 B Silent Type May 2024 #85
You need to read Ellen Brown article I cited she is very clear airplaneman May 2024 #87
I'll trust Brookings and the Congressional Budget Office. Silent Type May 2024 #88
I'm just trying to share information here. The Brookings article is talking about FTT on Stock Trades only airplaneman May 2024 #89
Info and other viewpoints are fine. If there is some relatively painless magical way to fund our needs, I'm all for it. Silent Type May 2024 #90
And until they sell their assets (and pay capital gains tax) that wealth is paper value. brooklynite May 2024 #47
Not really so for assets with quite liquid markets. unblock May 2024 #53
Majority rule would also help MadameButterfly May 2024 #17
Great posts bdamomma May 2024 #49
All either impossible TexasDem69 May 2024 #73
Beware minority rule MadameButterfly May 2024 #78
Income tax policy to at least stop the flow, keeping the imbalance from getting worse. paleotn May 2024 #20
We need to win the presidency and reform the Supreme Court MadameButterfly May 2024 #34
Thanks for being willing to accept higher taxes MadameButterfly May 2024 #35
With all due respect, that's your job. Joinfortmill May 2024 #72
Really? Anyway, Piketty recommends ... Dave says May 2024 #30
The solution is, they need to pay the same taxes Meadowoak May 2024 #45
With that kind of money, they can control the message by buying ... aggiesal May 2024 #50
We've needed trustbusting for a long time, especially in media MadameButterfly May 2024 #55
They already did that. live love laugh May 2024 #61
Did you forget your sarcasm emoticon? happy feet May 2024 #62
The problem is the bottom 50% clearly control too much wealth.... getagrip_already May 2024 #82
Starts with a T. Ends with an S kcr May 2024 #83
Kickin' Faux pas May 2024 #2
Obvious, nocoincidences May 2024 #4
Only if you are on a high fat, low fiber diet. erronis May 2024 #13
California rich people. They're the lean and free of nasty chemicals. paleotn May 2024 #22
CA has money woes. SleeplessinSoCal May 2024 #25
Just you wait.. Permanut May 2024 #5
Sure it will; second Tuesday of next week. onecaliberal May 2024 #6
Is that anything like getting pissed on? paleotn May 2024 #23
I've been saying serious for years and it's gotten worse. It's unsustainable. It won't last. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2024 #9
It could easily last under a Drumph election Evolve Dammit May 2024 #15
100% Wealth Tax on Estate Amounts Over $10 million. DJ Synikus Makisimus May 2024 #11
But that is the rule, surely? Aussie105 May 2024 #14
There are several changes we could make in this country slightlv May 2024 #18
We want a baseline of survival out of humanity but MadameButterfly May 2024 #36
I agree with you Madame... slightlv May 2024 #52
Yes, I've had fantasies of the country splitting into two so we could MadameButterfly May 2024 #56
Yes on all points:. The problem is republicans. onecaliberal May 2024 #84
This was the goal for Constitutional Originalists. SleeplessinSoCal May 2024 #24
alito and roberts are determined to take us back to the 1800s onecaliberal May 2024 #26
next generation won't know we once had a healthy middle class. SleeplessinSoCal May 2024 #27
I never voted for a recon. My dad was a WWII Veteran. onecaliberal May 2024 #33
If we cut rich people's taxes more Johonny May 2024 #28
What percentage of the 800 are REPUBLICANS? live love laugh May 2024 #29
My guess MadameButterfly May 2024 #37
If that's true, people would see that as a political advantage for them. Renew Deal May 2024 #41
They do. onecaliberal May 2024 #44
Mine too. At least 90%. live love laugh May 2024 #60
The dangers of Oligarchy MadameButterfly May 2024 #74
I wonder the very same things. live love laugh May 2024 #80
This might be a stretch but, Mr. Evil May 2024 #32
That's the short plot line of "Don't Look Up" and also of the "Left Behind" series. erronis May 2024 #39
the problem is capitalism Be The Light May 2024 #38
Unfettered and unregulated capitalism. erronis May 2024 #40
K&R onecaliberal May 2024 #43
The American Dream....Capitalist version. Ping Tung May 2024 #42
Rutger Bregman, Dutch historian said it at Davos 2019: PAY YOUR TAXES appalachiablue May 2024 #48
So true. And I've talked with people that object to higher-end tax rates with the same logic as lower-end tax rates. byronius May 2024 #58
Also check out this series in Propublica that outline how the wealthy hide money and avoid taxes erronis May 2024 #65
Post ww2 90-percent May 2024 #67
My horrifying hope 90-percent May 2024 #70
Yup, tax these M*fuckers. Joinfortmill May 2024 #71
Organized - Billionaires gather yearly at a finance conference SupportSanity May 2024 #81
Frankly and honestly, I thought the proportions would be worse. BobTheSubgenius May 2024 #86
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Houston, we have a proble...»Reply #31