Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(54,890 posts)
5. Senate Democrats Introduce Bill To Make US Supreme Court More Transparent
Thu May 23, 2024, 07:36 PM
May 2024
https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/senate-democrats-introduce-bill-to-make-us-supreme-court-more-transparent/

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), along with more than a dozen other Senate Democrats, introduced a bill on Wednesday requiring U.S. Supreme Court justices to provide written explanations and record votes for decisions in their emergency docket, also known as the shadow docket. “Our Shadow Docket Sunlight Act would open these decisions to greater public view and scrutiny— literally bringing light and accountability to outcomes of important cases now handed down in peremptory silence,” Blumenthal said in a statement.

The court’s shadow docket includes requests for immediate action from the court and primarily consists of requests to pause a lower court’s order, which voids a decision in a case while an appeal is ongoing. These cases require extraordinary circumstances and proof that people would suffer “irreparable harm” if the ruling was left in place. The justices have previously utilized the shadow docket to make decisions on COVID-19 policies, abortion access, immigration and redistricting.

In one of the most recent cases on the shadow docket, the Court granted requests from Louisiana, Black voters and civil rights organizations to allow the state’s new congressional map to remain in place while they considered an appeal over a lower court ruling that struck it down. Unlike the normal appeals process, cases that go through the Court’s shadow docket don’t have a full briefing and oral argument. The decisions are usually handed down in just a few days or weeks, released in short written orders with little to no reasoning — often not saying which justices supported or opposed it.

Blumenthal, a member of the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, introduced the Shadow Docket Sunlight Act to try to increase transparency within the nation’s highest court. This bill is co-sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin (D-Il.) and others including Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). This bill requires justices to provide a written explanation and indication of how each voted for decisions on the shadow docket. It also requires the Federal Judicial Center to report the Supreme Court’s compliance with the law to Congress each year.

snip

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Just keep leaning on them with whatever MOMFUDSKI May 2024 #1
lay it on DoBW May 2024 #6
Good. The radical REICH court has been using B.See May 2024 #2
Then we need a SCOTUS Ethical Review Board RainCaster May 2024 #3
SCOTUS would decline FBaggins May 2024 #4
Congress has significant power to regulate the Supreme Court Hermit-The-Prog May 2024 #17
Not in this area FBaggins May 2024 #18
Senate Democrats Introduce Bill To Make US Supreme Court More Transparent Celerity May 2024 #5
And if the Court gives the Senate the middle finger over this KS Toronado May 2024 #7
Can take their money away, make them work in the basement. Make them bring their own lunch Cheezoholic May 2024 #9
Not permitted under the constitution. onenote May 2024 #11
Then reclassify them as an Article XXX Judge with no benefits KS Toronado May 2024 #12
No there's not. onenote May 2024 #13
It's changing laws or making new ones, happens all the time. KS Toronado May 2024 #14
And courts overturn laws all the time FBaggins May 2024 #15
So Senator Blumenthal is just pissing in the wind KS Toronado May 2024 #21
If that was his goal - yes FBaggins May 2024 #22
Changing an express constitutional provision requires a constitutional amendment. And it doesn't happen all the time. onenote May 2024 #20
its not a criminal provision, so no they can't be locked up onenote May 2024 #10
Take their clerks away, make them work Cheezoholic May 2024 #8
SCOTUS will just say it violates separation of powers and toss it out. Takket May 2024 #16
Well sure. But that's only because... FBaggins May 2024 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senate Dems introduce bil...»Reply #5