Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Any military 'geeks': Can someone explain D-day to me? [View all]Abnredleg
(1,260 posts)3. Naval Gunfire is not that accurate
And the targets for the most part were small and well protected. Naval gunfire can erode an enemies defenses but to totally defeat them would take so much ammo and time as to be impractical.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The German positions were also set up at angles to provide crossfires. They weren't easy to fire right into
brewens
May 2024
#38
He probably meant that he killed that many soldiers during the whole battle of Normandy.
Dave Bowman
May 2024
#73
Yes, I edited my post to add some information about that guy after doing a search about him and
Dave Bowman
May 2024
#92
If it took a lot of time that would have defeated the purpose of a surprise attack.
Irish_Dem
May 2024
#8
Naval gunfire back in '44 wasn't all that accurate, but today's naval gunfire
MarineCombatEngineer
May 2024
#10
my father was the gun control officer ( but enlisted ) on the USS Parker ( a destroyer )
lapfog_1
May 2024
#93
Back in '44, the accuracy and lethality of naval gunfire was very spotty at best
MarineCombatEngineer
May 2024
#12
Every time I see the stats for D-day, I wish the Navy could have wasted the whole area.
Hermit-The-Prog
May 2024
#14
The Germans also had buried huge heavy metal spikes, aimed toward the sea, to disable tanks coming ashore.
Lonestarblue
May 2024
#65
Consider that this strategy was tried in WWI, and failed miserably each time.
NutmegYankee
May 2024
#34
It's not quite a new idea, is it? I didn't think to compare it to those actions.
Hermit-The-Prog
May 2024
#43
But the cliffs were the top of the land . they were not free standing with nothing behind. I doubt there was a through.
Srkdqltr
May 2024
#53
Just one path. I torture myself every Memorial Day by watching documentaris of D-day.
Hermit-The-Prog
May 2024
#13
Watched "D-Day: Lost Films" earlier today and I just wish we could rewind and re-do.
Hermit-The-Prog
May 2024
#46
Union Forces in the Civil War were 'fish in a barrel' during Battle of the Crater
BoRaGard
May 2024
#37
You have an extremely optimistic and unrealistic view of the effective of bombardment
Prairie Gates
May 2024
#7
It also would have given time for the Wehrmacht to move their forces to block the breakout
Prairie Gates
May 2024
#17
Yes, it was over a month of brutal fighting before it was clearly a successful invasion.
Hermit-The-Prog
May 2024
#20
Hardened bunkers reisist naval gun fire. We had the same problem in the Pacific.
NutmegYankee
May 2024
#27
A top military strategist told Eisenhower that the D-Day death rate could be as high as 75%.
Irish_Dem
May 2024
#63
Me, too. Grinding the chaff makes no more flour. But it is fun watching them standing with a bag awaiting the result ...
marble falls
May 2024
#94
The USN is under the impression they were at Normandy with the big guns Operation Neptune ...
marble falls
May 2024
#96
EVEN iF? A battleship's guns can put a shell 25 miles aways within 4ft of the target. A broadside from a battleship ...
marble falls
May 2024
#106
WHAT IF???? There, all better. If only some of those armchair Admirals had been there, Normandy would have ...
marble falls
May 2024
#110