Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let me explain one way you are about to get screwed by Obama's $250K tax break? [View all]HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)59. You act as though "we" hold all the cards. I wonder why "we" haven't succeeded in
holding their feet to the fire on income tax, then.
The 400 top taxpayers pay at an effective rate of 18%.
I'd be a little wary of getting on the bandwagon pushing for immediate changes to SS. You may get more than you bargained for.
There's no reason to do anything to SS now, as even the BS forecasts say it's fine for another 20 years. Yet everybody seems convinced something must be done now. Why?
So income taxes don't need to be raised on the rich, that's why. So they can keep funding the federal budget on the extra taxes you just OK'd for another 20 years -- increasing the SS debt and giving them more to demagogue 20 years from now, when they start the same drumbeat again.
Reagan redux.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Let me explain one way you are about to get screwed by Obama's $250K tax break? [View all]
kentuck
Nov 2012
OP
If you make six figures, I find it difficult to work up the necessary empathy...
Tarheel_Dem
Nov 2012
#2
This slice of the population, folks dependent primarily on earned income making about
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#3
It's not about *you*. I don't care what *you* support. It's about what *most* people
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#8
I'm fairly sure a lot of people in the upper brackets know about the cap. Or their accountants
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#16
gee, do we get to vote on what to do about SS? i didn't know that. yeah, our representatives
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#62
as i said, people in this bracket pay combined federal taxes at a combined higher rate
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#10
I think it's pretty obvious how higher taxes without higher benefits would act to decrease
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#14
he may be an asshat, but he's saying what everyone knows & won't say. decreasing
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#64
I'm clearly not referring to the general population, but to the high-earning workers whose
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#19
"they" all do? but you are one of those high income workers who doesn't, you said?
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#36
yes, i'm a closet limbaugh supporter, my posting history certainly demonstrates that.
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#40
So you're saying not only will higher-earners pay more, they'll also get higher benefits?
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#63
Social Security has never been progressive so far as its taxation goes. Yet it's survived
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#58
You act as though "we" hold all the cards. I wonder why "we" haven't succeeded in
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#59
Yes, the powerful already agitate against it. They'll have more material to work with when
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#67
"the rich" get most of their income from capital and don't pay much in the way of SS taxes.
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#72
and you still don't get shit if the cap is eliminated. So what's the relevance?
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#65
you can support it all you like, you won't get it. but they'll take your "tradeoff" & screw
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#41
because such a big percentage of the population makes so little. the average income
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#48
I didn't discount anything. I just said you can support the idea all you like but it won't
HiPointDem
Nov 2012
#53
This isn't "Obama's" tax break. This has been the case for decades, if not forever.
pnwmom
Nov 2012
#52
I still can't work out why you're trying to blame Obama for a decades-old situation
muriel_volestrangler
Nov 2012
#68