Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
134. Unfortunately they don't
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 10:16 AM
Nov 2012

they'll still be here blaring about how we should shut up and accept the appeasement/right-wing lurch

Well, you're on record. Not that anyone gives a shit. Someone has to stop this.... Tarheel_Dem Nov 2012 #1
No, I am not a good Repubican who blindly approves everything "mypresident" does. MotherPetrie Nov 2012 #7
Oh, I'm sure you don't "blindly approve of everything 'my president' does". Tarheel_Dem Nov 2012 #12
As a woman- that will be a bad move LukeFL Nov 2012 #57
Chuck Hagel donnasgirl Nov 2012 #217
I'll stop the "partisan bullshit" when the Republicans stop being the party of bullshit Scootaloo Nov 2012 #9
So you agree that Dems should only work with Dems, and vice versa? Tarheel_Dem Nov 2012 #10
That's not what he said or what I said. "WORKING WITH" is not the same thing as NOMINATING To MotherPetrie Nov 2012 #13
Well apparently McCain, Graham, and Collins all agree with you. They want JK. Tarheel_Dem Nov 2012 #15
They only want JK so Scott Brown can run for his Senate seat. n/t intheflow Nov 2012 #51
Every one 0of them has made positive statements about Kerry as a person and as karynnj Nov 2012 #127
And how honest have they been in their dealings with Rice. daleanime Nov 2012 #215
Where were all these republicans when Kerry was getting swift-boated? Seedersandleechers Nov 2012 #224
I believe the strategy is called "being kicked upstairs." savannah43 Nov 2012 #268
No, they want senator Brown back. quakerboy Nov 2012 #56
blueorchid blueorchid Nov 2012 #254
Welcome to DU! Can't the legislature just change the law again and make the seat a governors appoint hrmjustin Nov 2012 #256
You're kidding right? zentrum Nov 2012 #62
No they don't... Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #157
Yeah, Republicans just fucking love John Kerry Fumesucker Nov 2012 #180
Thanks for posting that. GOP were handing out those goddam stickers and McCain and AlinPA Nov 2012 #245
Clueless and tone deaf to how republicans lie. Jakes Progress Nov 2012 #241
It is not a "reward" jberryhill Nov 2012 #19
Of course it is a reward. MotherPetrie Nov 2012 #28
No, these are very important jobs... jberryhill Nov 2012 #42
They are both rewards and important positions. Laurian Nov 2012 #247
I totally agree with you. The SOS in a Democratic Administration should be a Democrat. sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #25
Obama has not said the vetting is for SoS. It could be for Director of CIA. Tx4obama Nov 2012 #32
I'm going to wade in here and hope I survive with my head intact... ReRe Nov 2012 #72
I agree. If not Director of CIA, then Sec of Defense. But NOT Sec of State. Tx4obama Nov 2012 #74
Well, if we can femrap Nov 2012 #227
OF COURSE! robinlynne Nov 2012 #175
I once read some one describing the two parties as "one shirt, two pockets." savannah43 Nov 2012 #269
How about Republicans work WITH DEMOCRATS. Notice how the person you responded sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #47
Wish I could rec this post, Sabrina! I'll simply say a hearty & vociferous +1!!! n/t tpsbmam Nov 2012 #290
I agree with you LukeFL Nov 2012 #60
I think that Dems should not work with people who have a policy of fucking America over Scootaloo Nov 2012 #24
I think Dems should fucking destroy the repukes. We won the election, time to shut morningfog Nov 2012 #148
Have we entered some alternate universe ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #164
Thank You! Tarheel_Dem Nov 2012 #168
The operative word is the 'talented player', the 'accomplished employee'. Cleita Nov 2012 #249
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #255
Like I said this worked fifty years ago, but things started getting polarized Cleita Nov 2012 #262
In my experience, the arrogant brash employee will work toward the boss' goals ONLY... Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2012 #260
Republicans get what they want by stnading firm and being partisan assholes. They are not going robinlynne Nov 2012 #173
You can't be nice to these people? butterfly77 Nov 2012 #237
It wouldn't hurt for the Dems and the president to tell..... Hotler Nov 2012 #221
In this day and age, I agree that Dems should only work with Dems. Cleita Nov 2012 #248
Well put. Magoo48 Nov 2012 #132
The poster didn't say what you wrote. The concern was about a republican former Senator who bluestate10 Nov 2012 #27
I have absolutely no qualms about Wesley Clark working in this administration. Tarheel_Dem Nov 2012 #43
You're naive LukeFL Nov 2012 #63
You're calling the President "naive"? Yeah, I Cha Nov 2012 #70
Call it naive... sendero Nov 2012 #114
The President has his way of doing things.. and it's not Cha Nov 2012 #252
What it generally has been. sendero Nov 2012 #261
No, he's not. The gops made a pact to obstruct the night Obama was Cha Nov 2012 #265
Prove it. You're the one making the empty assertion. The naive charge here is well founded. ancianita Nov 2012 #291
Or, it could be that Obama is continuously showing how the GOP is only savannah43 Nov 2012 #272
That would be a good theory.... sendero Nov 2012 #282
oh the deep deep irony!!! your post is fabulously dripping deliciously ironic! BOFFO!!! graham4anything Nov 2012 #85
It would be nice for you to explain what the hell you are talking about. nt bluestate10 Nov 2012 #167
Wesley Clark great as he is thought to be VOTED FOR REAGAN AND NIXON graham4anything Nov 2012 #198
Shorn of all the sturm und drang . . . MrModerate Nov 2012 #40
Please understand this: I am not advocating for Chuck Hagel. I just don't agree... Tarheel_Dem Nov 2012 #46
So you say Republicans are as honorable as Democrats? Did you miss the election? Bluenorthwest Nov 2012 #110
They were doing everything in their power Generic Other Nov 2012 #141
totally agree Euphoria Nov 2012 #160
This is something that has become more than obvious sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #212
Ray LaHood has been an outstanding Secretary of Transportation who has called Republicans out on Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2012 #233
Agreed that not all Republicans are insane — statistically alone, that's unlikely . . . MrModerate Nov 2012 #263
Really? Like Romney would have LukeFL Nov 2012 #55
I think Hagel is a balloon.... ReRe Nov 2012 #73
I hope we don't make decisions based on what 'they' would or wouldn't do duhneece Nov 2012 #116
You could and should have made a valid point in a more civil manner. Jim Lane Nov 2012 #88
Well bubba, we are all going to die in any case. You have yet to give any cogent reason whatsoever Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #90
we dont need to stop this 'partisan bullshit' as you call it bowens43 Nov 2012 #96
Yah, lets make the House completely irrelevant. nt Flatulo Nov 2012 #297
Straw Man Argument NWHarkness Nov 2012 #109
LOL, gullible much? Logical Nov 2012 #122
Let the Repukes stop the "partisan bullshit" Doctor_J Nov 2012 #135
You are naive and delusional to think the partisanship is anywhere near morningfog Nov 2012 #146
You are very wrong. Partisan bullshit will continue on the part of the GOp nomatter what we do. It i robinlynne Nov 2012 #172
Putting a weasel in the henhouse is definitely not going to help stop the killing. Zorra Nov 2012 #211
You're femrap Nov 2012 #225
Gee, by that standard, why not Mutt Romney? stupidicus Nov 2012 #229
Get over yourself, no-ones gonna die if Kucinich is on the cabinet instead. Unreal. grahamhgreen Nov 2012 #285
!!! thems fightin woids! PUT EM UP!11!! dionysus Nov 2012 #301
This belongs in META cthulu2016 Nov 2012 #2
Hunh? A strongly worded disagreement with centrist tacking by the administration belongs coalition_unwilling Nov 2012 #77
Hunh? If the OP cannot make a point without whining about DU then it is META cthulu2016 Nov 2012 #184
Oh, I got you. Sorry I over-reacted. I guess I didn't tune in initially to the criticism of DUers coalition_unwilling Nov 2012 #190
Well, for one, Chuck Hagel would not be able to vote on anything as the SOS WCGreen Nov 2012 #3
No - Hagel and his right-wing record would just represent the U.S. world-wide. He would be face of MotherPetrie Nov 2012 #5
Do you really think that the across the globe uber popular president Obama WCGreen Nov 2012 #20
His past voting record is completely at odds with Obama's. It sure could be used as ammunition. MotherPetrie Nov 2012 #26
It is a totally different job. WCGreen Nov 2012 #41
Hagel most likely is being vetted for Director of CIA, not Sec of State. Tx4obama Nov 2012 #44
Duh alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #91
Well that last Republican CIA director was certainly a tower of propriety and ethics! Bluenorthwest Nov 2012 #111
Do you really view these things only in terms of making things easy for one person? sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #22
It's a way to show the people who are not hyper-partisan that Obama is willing WCGreen Nov 2012 #292
Why are Democrats always 'reaching out'? Towards the Right? We are always leaning over to sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #295
I got nothing more... WCGreen Nov 2012 #296
"Also, he serves at the beck and call of the President and not the republican party." savannah43 Nov 2012 #273
Any member of the cabinet serves at the whim of the president.... WCGreen Nov 2012 #293
No more of these Repukes! DearHeart Nov 2012 #4
Thank you. MotherPetrie Nov 2012 #6
Didn't Hillary vote for all the stuff you laid out there? Tarheel_Dem Nov 2012 #17
She's a -- you know -- DEMOCRAT! She may not have a perfect voting record - MotherPetrie Nov 2012 #23
Doesn't answer my question. The poster itemized some issues he had a problem with.... Tarheel_Dem Nov 2012 #34
Being a REPUBLICAN is a disqualifier. If that isn't obvious to you, I wonder why you're on DU. MotherPetrie Nov 2012 #193
Yes she did which is why I never supported her and would never support her for sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #213
Yes she did and I don't like her being the SOS. DearHeart Nov 2012 #80
absolutely. elections SHOULD have consequences. bowens43 Nov 2012 #97
I vote for Bill Clinton Angry Dragon Nov 2012 #8
Bill Clinton? freetrucker53 Dec 2012 #304
Won't sex ya, but I totally agree. Tutonic Nov 2012 #11
I've been amazed over the last 4 years at how much Obama gets a pass from DUers. begin_within Nov 2012 #14
Me too? SammyWinstonJack Nov 2012 #118
You're absolutely right. We elect Democrats in order to get rid of Republicans. sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #16
K&R! Holeee shit, I just visitied the link someone posted upthead! Poll_Blind Nov 2012 #18
Who's next? Art_from_Ark Nov 2012 #29
We must learn to be tolerant of other people's beliefs MannyGoldstein Nov 2012 #37
Particularly PRO Corporate Beliefs... Iggy Nov 2012 #102
Tolerance is a good start, but to really understand our potential allies on the far right Dragonfli Nov 2012 #120
That was tried by the appeasers in term 1 Doctor_J Nov 2012 #137
Most serious pragmatic adults realize that the mistake was we did not go far enough right! Dragonfli Nov 2012 #203
Where's Dr Fate? OnyxCollie Nov 2012 #220
Likely erecting a shrine to honor his prophet WILL MARSHALL Dragonfli Nov 2012 #234
Thanks for the humor, irony, sarcasm...Dragonfli and Manny Goldstein... KoKo Nov 2012 #151
lols...thanks for this. KoKo Nov 2012 #152
Chuck Hagel is already part of the Obama Administration. Tx4obama Nov 2012 #38
yeah, some of us did progressoid Nov 2012 #156
Wow...and he's supposed to be a moderate republican???? n/t bluethruandthru Nov 2012 #231
I could live with him at defense, I think he actually could be good at CIA dsc Nov 2012 #21
Chuck Hagel is ALREADY PART OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTATION. Tx4obama Nov 2012 #30
No, I'll leave my post right here, thank you very much. Oh - MotherPetrie Nov 2012 #31
We need healing now, not hate. MannyGoldstein Nov 2012 #33
. Union Scribe Nov 2012 #66
You had me scared for a minute there. robinlynne Nov 2012 #176
Enough with appointing Republicans KT2000 Nov 2012 #35
Mother SamKnause Nov 2012 #36
Spent the whole day arguing with third way "democrat" relatives abelenkpe Nov 2012 #39
Obama has not said the vetting is for SoS. Most likely it is for Director of CIA. Tx4obama Nov 2012 #45
Why is it that, after an election victory, some "Dems" want to move to the right? Bozita Nov 2012 #48
Chuck Hagel has been part of the Obama Administration since 2009 Tx4obama Nov 2012 #53
That's supposed to make everything better? Lol. nt laundry_queen Nov 2012 #143
Look who these people are. woo me with science Nov 2012 #139
Nailed it...! KoKo Nov 2012 #158
Tell it like it is, woo. This should be its own OP. Seriously. Melinda Nov 2012 #159
Damn! +1000 Poll_Blind Nov 2012 #169
You whatchamacallit Nov 2012 #177
I concur, the same group, the same con for years. I also believe it is time to wake up Dragonfli Nov 2012 #197
Excellent post as always. And this needs to be said over and over again to counteract sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #214
Because they are lying politicians ann--- Nov 2012 #207
It's not "kissing butt" to try to work with the other side. CheapShotArtist Nov 2012 #228
the last four years PROVED we don't need to work with the other side.. frylock Nov 2012 #280
Exactly! ann--- Nov 2012 #294
So when is the Other Side going to work with Democrats? sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #299
Good to keep your friends close but your enemies even closer ... MindMover Nov 2012 #49
Only when defending Obama is more important to you than resisting Republican assholes. MotherPetrie Nov 2012 #196
And the voices that claimed Obama would go more to the Left this 4 years.... Bonobo Nov 2012 #50
Lol, is anyone surprised? sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #58
Wow, so true. Imagine if I had started an OP pushing for Chuck Hagel for SOS Bonobo Nov 2012 #61
Someone should try it one day, before it is generally known to be not the idea of the sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #67
That would be an interesting experiment Dragonfli Nov 2012 #98
No one has posted any threads pushing for Hagel to be SoS. The articles ... Tx4obama Nov 2012 #71
Has anyone done that? joshcryer Nov 2012 #89
Holy Miss-the-Point, Batman! nt Bonobo Nov 2012 #92
Get back to me when Hagel is appointed. joshcryer Nov 2012 #99
It is enough that he is being vetted. nt Bonobo Nov 2012 #101
Not really. joshcryer Nov 2012 #104
You no longer surprise me. At all. nt Bonobo Nov 2012 #107
Hagel was critical of Bush's "surge." joshcryer Nov 2012 #108
So if it were to happen whatchamacallit Nov 2012 #185
Depends. I will make a post about it. joshcryer Nov 2012 #239
Nailed whatchamacallit Nov 2012 #182
Unfortunately they don't Doctor_J Nov 2012 #134
some leading democrats prefer republicans to highly qualified liberal democrats nt msongs Nov 2012 #52
You may well have a point, but I won't fuck you. Ken Burch Nov 2012 #54
Patraeus is a registered Republican - if he's replaced by Hagel then what's the big F'ing deal? Tx4obama Nov 2012 #59
We objected strenuously to Petraeus because he was a Republican and we were sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #64
+1,000,000,000 x 1,000,000,000 - Well put and definitely coalition_unwilling Nov 2012 #82
With Hagel.. zentrum Nov 2012 #65
See comment #76 n/t Tx4obama Nov 2012 #86
So you keep touting Petraeus as if he had not brought dishonor to the office and to Bluenorthwest Nov 2012 #115
Sorry, but you have no idea what you are talking about Inuca Nov 2012 #183
You're wrong. See my post, #233 Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2012 #235
The Third Way/"New Democrats" ALWAYS lean right, hoping nobody will notice. blkmusclmachine Nov 2012 #68
Hagel questioned Petraeus in 2007 - VIDEO Tx4obama Nov 2012 #69
Sen. Chuck Hagel: "What do you believe?" (Jan. 24, 2007) Tx4obama Nov 2012 #75
'Hagel was a harsh critic of George W. Bush's foreign policy, elleng Nov 2012 #76
He is a RINO, everyone knows it..I almost dislike RINOs as much as I dislike DINOs pipoman Nov 2012 #105
It's not about party loyalty Inuca Nov 2012 #186
That may be an excuse for an occasional pipoman Nov 2012 #232
Emphatic K&R. If Hagel wants to be a part of this adminsitration, he needs to coalition_unwilling Nov 2012 #78
Chuck Hagel has been part of the Obama Administration since 2009 Tx4obama Nov 2012 #79
I should have been more specific, as the president is entitled to seek advice coalition_unwilling Nov 2012 #83
Why let the truth like that spoil the above people's factless lies??? graham4anything Nov 2012 #84
Don't let some facts get in the way bashing the adminstration and Duers. FSogol Nov 2012 #126
Dear MotherPetrie... ReRe Nov 2012 #81
I love you quote Lincoln in your signature. Makes your words so Ironic graham4anything Nov 2012 #87
Whew! You're about the best rantor I ever heard... ReRe Nov 2012 #103
Most of my thread was referring to others, not yours. graham4anything Nov 2012 #131
I agree with everything you said... ReRe Nov 2012 #140
Actually, I like the idea of nominating Jon Huntsman...guess I'm a turncoat. NC_Nurse Nov 2012 #93
Rumor mongers. JNelson6563 Nov 2012 #94
Agreed. Not trustworthy. bluerum Nov 2012 #95
Post removed Post removed Nov 2012 #100
I feel RINOs like Hagel and DINOs like Lieberman pipoman Nov 2012 #106
Welcome to the Big Tent. First day here? Get a GRIP on reality please. Coyotl Nov 2012 #112
Speculative outrage is the best outrage...nt SidDithers Nov 2012 #113
CALL CONGRESS RIGHT NOW $#%@ FSogol Nov 2012 #125
Realize that a lot of people come here because of the graphics and crackerjack web design. Smarmie Doofus Nov 2012 #117
One thing about it madokie Nov 2012 #119
K&R. It is SICKENING to see right wingers being defended here. I do not understand it! forestpath Nov 2012 #121
I like Hagel. So sue me. babylonsister Nov 2012 #123
better to march in lockstep freetrucker53 Nov 2012 #124
"Your not going to get real debate here. " ProSense Nov 2012 #136
This is that upsetting? ProSense Nov 2012 #128
100% bullshit spanone Nov 2012 #129
Calling Skittles. Skittles..... lonestarnot Nov 2012 #130
It's for Dems and those who support everything the president does Doctor_J Nov 2012 #133
Well, well -- another billh58 Nov 2012 #138
We elected the President, now he gets to decide who he puts in his cabinet. It is not up to you. I Pisces Nov 2012 #142
Someone should read the president DU's TOS whatchamacallit Nov 2012 #144
Not exactly. ananda Nov 2012 #147
Mengele is hyperbole, but you get my point whatchamacallit Nov 2012 #153
The reliable Third Way brigade. nt woo me with science Nov 2012 #155
It's really funny to watch people go absolutely apeshit over things that haven't even happened yet. NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #145
Absolutely... SidDithers Nov 2012 #150
Maybe it won't happen whatchamacallit Nov 2012 #154
There's nothing saying Hagel is being vetted for SoS. That makes this OP even funnier. NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #162
Maybe you should inform whatchamacallit Nov 2012 #165
...who is saying exactly the same thing I just said. NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #187
But also defending the choice were it to be true n/t whatchamacallit Nov 2012 #194
I speak only for myself. NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #200
I posted an article on DU that said 'someone' said he was being vetted for SoS or DoD. Tx4obama Nov 2012 #274
Nonsense. We have already been sold. woo me with science Nov 2012 #174
Right. Let's all just stfu and wait till it's too late. Jakes Progress Nov 2012 #242
Yes and after it's too late, those that gave the speeches not to worry seem to be rhett o rick Nov 2012 #302
Along with the admonition Jakes Progress Dec 2012 #303
Actually most presidents dem or rep have a member of the opposition party in the cabinet WI_DEM Nov 2012 #149
I think you are mistaking democrats for progressives IDoMath Nov 2012 #161
I like Hagel. He used to be Senator when I lived in NE. TwilightGardener Nov 2012 #163
HERESY!!!!1!1!11!! WilliamPitt Nov 2012 #166
LOL. TwilightGardener Nov 2012 #170
So you're making fun of people who DON'T support a rightwing Republican being part of Obama's admin? MotherPetrie Nov 2012 #192
*sigh* WilliamPitt Nov 2012 #202
I'm sorry too. His voting record is as right wing as theyc ome. Did you vote for him, too? MotherPetrie Nov 2012 #191
No. TwilightGardener Nov 2012 #195
I agree. robinlynne Nov 2012 #171
Pro-war? Daniel537 Nov 2012 #178
Photo please. Before I consider fucking you. postulater Nov 2012 #179
I'm sure the President could not give two shits about what some of you think. great white snark Nov 2012 #181
You mean he has WORSE things to do. And I am easily satisfied. MotherPetrie Nov 2012 #199
No, not even then, because talking about THAT... bvar22 Nov 2012 #210
Golly. Since you seem to be someone the president does give two shits about Jakes Progress Nov 2012 #243
Supporting Hagel for anything on this board should earn one a pizza. nt. NCTraveler Nov 2012 #188
Pizza? Inuca Nov 2012 #189
Sexy combination. Could be a turn on. Ohh.... ummm. What board am I on again. nt. NCTraveler Nov 2012 #208
"Do as DU says, not as the president does!" whatchamacallit Nov 2012 #201
In a nutshell, yes.... Dragonfli Nov 2012 #204
. . . . . . . . WilliamPitt Nov 2012 #205
I thought supporting Republicans was a violation of the rules here. sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #219
I'm against it, too ann--- Nov 2012 #206
Thanks. Awesome post. I'm right there with you. nt Zorra Nov 2012 #209
+1000 blackspade Nov 2012 #216
Excuse me folks but Vietnameravet Nov 2012 #218
"Some of you are as unbending and demanding as Republicans". CheapShotArtist Nov 2012 #236
Heck no. He appointed Republican hero General Betrayus to the post of CIA Director. Zorra Nov 2012 #259
I too wonder about this continuation of bipartisan compromise. I think Paul Wellstone said it best: midnight Nov 2012 #222
Just a rumor brush Nov 2012 #223
indeed, it gets him nothing but a lot of dismay from his base stupidicus Nov 2012 #226
I've been preparing myself femrap Nov 2012 #230
K&R for use of the word fuck! trailmonkee Nov 2012 #238
I seriously have to wonder... MirrorAshes Nov 2012 #240
Very well put n/t Inuca Nov 2012 #251
Spot on! Thanks for this. nt babylonsister Nov 2012 #264
I'm so old that I know Chuck is a douche...I just can't remember the particulars. peace13 Nov 2012 #244
This message was self-deleted by its author sharp_stick Nov 2012 #246
Welcome to all the Newcomers defending the GOP leftstreet Nov 2012 #250
I want Kerry! blue cat Nov 2012 #253
I‘m guilty of reccomending him. I‘m applegrove Nov 2012 #257
I would be very surprised if Hagel is being seriously considered....... Swede Atlanta Nov 2012 #258
Article that came out today says Dept of Defense NOT Sec of State. I think it'll be CIA Tx4obama Nov 2012 #277
Post removed Post removed Nov 2012 #266
Hagel the horrible! Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2012 #267
as a Bona fide "radical leftist" I STRONGLY, STRONGLY support Chuck Hagel's nomination Douglas Carpenter Nov 2012 #270
Don't most administrations appoint a few from the other party to posts of some sort? gateley Nov 2012 #271
Yes, they do. Jennicut Nov 2012 #278
I agree about Hagel -- good experience, and I think he's a good guy. gateley Nov 2012 #283
This thread... The Old Creak Nov 2012 #275
well I like Chuck. PatrynXX Nov 2012 #276
In what world kurtzapril4 Nov 2012 #286
Secretary of DEFENSE rumored short list: John Kerry, Chuck Hagel, Ashton Carter Tx4obama Nov 2012 #279
he'd probably be a fine sec. of state arely staircase Nov 2012 #281
I don't blindly trust Obama's judgment, but I do trust his judgment xxxsdesdexxx Nov 2012 #284
Right. Extrajudicial killing of Americans. Priceless. grahamhgreen Nov 2012 #287
Again. I actually trust President Obama's judgment -- not the judgment of George W. Bush xxxsdesdexxx Nov 2012 #288
That's dictatorship. grahamhgreen Nov 2012 #298
Nominate Bill Clinton creeksneakers2 Nov 2012 #289
This is a "Well, fuck me. I thought I was on a DEMOCRATIC forum." KICK nt Zorra Nov 2012 #300
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Well, fuck me. I thought ...»Reply #134