Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm still confused (Trump trial). [View all]Ohio Joe
(21,898 posts)33. " ALL falsifications of business records could be assumed to be in aid of covering up another crime"
They are
Sort of.
My brother was an auditor for DOD for 20 years and this is exactly what he looked for. The reason this case seems so unusual is because pretty much nobody fights in court. Every time someone is caught they are told to take the misdemeanor and pay a fine in line with the crime or when we go to trial it will be prosecuted as in furtherance of another crime and as a felony.
So while they are ALL in furtherance of another crime, they are rarely charged that way because pretty much everyone takes the deal.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I have heard #1 referred to and defined multiple times, how his actions could interfere with the
Eliot Rosewater
Jun 2024
#1
Trump paid David Pecker (National Enquirer) to kill negative stories about Trump and to
wnylib
Jun 2024
#24
The method of "withholding info" was to pay off people to buy and kill the stories, which is an "in kind" campaign
Grown2Hate
Jun 2024
#32
I'm sure they did. The opening and closing arguments lasted for hours, and they'd go over the laws then
viva la
Jun 2024
#17
My recollection of what the talking heads claimed about the judges charge was that all the ...
Jim__
Jun 2024
#60
The services Pecker provided Trump via National Enquirer were illegal campaign donations.
blm
Jun 2024
#4
" ALL falsifications of business records could be assumed to be in aid of covering up another crime"
Ohio Joe
Jun 2024
#33
I think the 3 options were given so that the jury didn't waste unnecessary time trying to figure out trump's motives
ecstatic
Jun 2024
#47
And none of it gets to a grand jury or through a grand jury if it is not a crime etc.
Eliot Rosewater
Jun 2024
#76
When candidate spends money to further campaign, the expenditure must be reported,
struggle4progress
Jun 2024
#75
Good explanation also. Election interference is what the story is, may not be the
Eliot Rosewater
Jun 2024
#77
The way I understand it is that any politician who enters into an NDA must report it as a campaign contribution
MichMan
Jun 2024
#89