Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm still confused (Trump trial). [View all]Jim__
(15,267 posts)57. Here is a copy of the indictment and the law he was charged under.
The indictment consistently (details as to check numbers and payees differ) lists the crimes as :
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, by this indictment, accuses
the defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST
DEGREE, in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:
The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,
with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission
thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoice
from Michael Cohen dated February 14, 2017, marked as a record of the Donald J. Trump
Revocable Trust, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization..
the defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST
DEGREE, in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:
The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,
with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission
thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoice
from Michael Cohen dated February 14, 2017, marked as a record of the Donald J. Trump
Revocable Trust, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization..
New York Penal Law 175.10:
§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
I leave it up to lawyers to say how the appeal is likely to go.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I have heard #1 referred to and defined multiple times, how his actions could interfere with the
Eliot Rosewater
Jun 2024
#1
Trump paid David Pecker (National Enquirer) to kill negative stories about Trump and to
wnylib
Jun 2024
#24
The method of "withholding info" was to pay off people to buy and kill the stories, which is an "in kind" campaign
Grown2Hate
Jun 2024
#32
I'm sure they did. The opening and closing arguments lasted for hours, and they'd go over the laws then
viva la
Jun 2024
#17
My recollection of what the talking heads claimed about the judges charge was that all the ...
Jim__
Jun 2024
#60
The services Pecker provided Trump via National Enquirer were illegal campaign donations.
blm
Jun 2024
#4
" ALL falsifications of business records could be assumed to be in aid of covering up another crime"
Ohio Joe
Jun 2024
#33
I think the 3 options were given so that the jury didn't waste unnecessary time trying to figure out trump's motives
ecstatic
Jun 2024
#47
And none of it gets to a grand jury or through a grand jury if it is not a crime etc.
Eliot Rosewater
Jun 2024
#76
When candidate spends money to further campaign, the expenditure must be reported,
struggle4progress
Jun 2024
#75
Good explanation also. Election interference is what the story is, may not be the
Eliot Rosewater
Jun 2024
#77
The way I understand it is that any politician who enters into an NDA must report it as a campaign contribution
MichMan
Jun 2024
#89