Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(56,214 posts)
3. wow, i didn't know they tampered with the evidence.
Mon Jun 3, 2024, 01:25 PM
Jun 2024

i see the argument that it doesn't matter in terms of the evidence itself, as only the original, untampered evidence will be presented to the jury. also, adding that they claim to have checked his car registration doesn't have anything to do with whether or not hunter lied on the form.

but surely the fact that a witness tampered with evidence would normally be relevant to that witness's general credibility. it shows they made a mistake and tried to cover it up, which raises the question of what other mistakes did they make and what else are they covering up. it does suggest that they might lie, or at least not be forthcoming with the truth.

this seem to be to be at less reasonably good grounds for appeal -- though that i'm guessing would come after the election....

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge blocks key defense ...»Reply #3