Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

FBaggins

(28,706 posts)

6. Not really much to judge on here

Reply to mahina (Reply #2)

Mon Jun 3, 2024, 01:42 PM

Jun 2024

Yes - an offer of proof should include a summary of what the expert witness will testify to so that the opposing party can prepare. But I wouldn’t expect that gap to be in-cured this late in the game.

The other issue is much the same. Can’t see why it would be relevant (and thus why the defense wants it)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

mahina

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge blocks key defense evidence and witness on eve of Hunter Biden gun trial [View all] TheProle Jun 2024 OP

Same judge that blew up the plea deal wishstar Jun 2024 #1

Both of these seem like unfair exclusions. Any legal folks see differently? Thank you. mahina Jun 2024 #2

Not really much to judge on here FBaggins Jun 2024 #6

Thanks mahina Jun 2024 #8

wow, i didn't know they tampered with the evidence. unblock Jun 2024 #3

as for the "inadequacy of defendant's disclosure" regarding a proposed witness's testimony, unblock Jun 2024 #4

Judge Was Appointed by Trump DET Jun 2024 #5

Seems like everytime it's a tRUMP judge that is making decisions in the courts. bluestarone Jun 2024 #7