Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

B.See

(8,502 posts)

29. Once again, legalese becomes employed to

Reply to Nevilledog (Original post)

Fri Jun 14, 2024, 07:15 PM

Jun 2024

DO THE WRONG THING.

The left keep bringing knives, while the right bring guns...

with bumpstocks.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clarence Thomas' Opinion Legalizing Bump Stocks Is Indefensible [View all] Nevilledog Jun 2024 OP

So how much of a kickback did he get for this ruling? nt mitch96 Jun 2024 #1

yes. Think. Again. Jun 2024 #6

Thomas will gladly sacrifice American lives for a nice vacation. Irish_Dem Jun 2024 #28

Dumbfounded. Karma13612 Jun 2024 #2

The Idi Amin of the Supreme Court understands nothing, except this: peppertree Jun 2024 #13

Thanks edhopper Jun 2024 #3

Founding fathers did not want Americans killed with military weapons. Irish_Dem Jun 2024 #30

Sadly, gunners are orgasmic over the opinion. Kingofalldems Jun 2024 #4

Post removed Post removed Jun 2024 #5

What is your goal here? Do you think your arguments will persuade people this is okay? Nevilledog Jun 2024 #8

My goal here is to point out incorrect information. yagotme Jun 2024 #9

I can form my decisions based on the fact bump stocks should be illegal. Nevilledog Jun 2024 #15

The details are what makes laws good or bad. yagotme Jun 2024 #18

The court's role does not include what "should be" legal or illegal FBaggins Jun 2024 #21

This guy has it wrong? dpibel Jun 2024 #12

Fact checks: yagotme Jun 2024 #17

Some of what you say is incoherent dpibel Jun 2024 #41

Well, I'll try again: yagotme Jun 2024 #43

"If an AR-15 with a bump stock is a machine gun" FBaggins Jun 2024 #22

Just functions like one dpibel Jun 2024 #42

Well... no FBaggins Jun 2024 #46

We're the envy of the world. Uh huh. Marcus IM Jun 2024 #7

Opinion dedicated to Las Vegas shooter? moondust Jun 2024 #10

Someone ask Thomas pwb Jun 2024 #11

I don't even know what a rapid loading magazine is TexasDem69 Jun 2024 #37

You figured it out. pwb Jun 2024 #44

As long as Harlan is happy Blue Idaho Jun 2024 #14

Why? DET Jun 2024 #16

INFURIATING dickthegrouch Jun 2024 #19

Are we now advocating the Bible sarisataka Jun 2024 #25

Post removed Post removed Jun 2024 #20

Would like to Rebl2 Jun 2024 #23

***sigh*** melm00se Jun 2024 #24

As is apparent from this thread, the decision is defensible 0rganism Jun 2024 #26

Great post TexasDem69 Jun 2024 #38

The US Supreme Court has blood on its hands. Irish_Dem Jun 2024 #27

Once again, legalese becomes employed to B.See Jun 2024 #29

And yet, DU has at least one very busy gun aficionado defending Clarence today... Hekate Jun 2024 #31

Shouldn't DU defend the rule of law? TexasDem69 Jun 2024 #39

Weak n/t kcr Jun 2024 #45

The SAD part is, one day soon this SC will see the BLOODY MASSACRE bluestarone Jun 2024 #32

Rejoicing on the wrong side! IzzaNuDay Jun 2024 #33

He'll have rafts of sea-lions defending his decision Torchlight Jun 2024 #34

Yeah jimfields33 Jun 2024 #36

Where in the Constitution does an Orginalist see reference to gun ACCESSORIES? PeaceWave Jun 2024 #35

You clearly didn't read the opinion TexasDem69 Jun 2024 #40

Couldn't be that the NRA has paid for a pricey vacation. yellowcanine Jun 2024 #47