Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Clarence Thomas' Opinion Legalizing Bump Stocks Is Indefensible [View all]PeaceWave
(3,383 posts)35. Where in the Constitution does an Orginalist see reference to gun ACCESSORIES?
The next shoe to drop will be rendering unconstitutional any ban on suppressors - which are currently illegal in 8 states, all of them Democratic (California, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island). Then will come legalization of fully automatic machine guns - which will be marketed as high volume sport hunting rifles or some such nonsense. Where will the insanity end?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What is your goal here? Do you think your arguments will persuade people this is okay?
Nevilledog
Jun 2024
#8
And yet, DU has at least one very busy gun aficionado defending Clarence today...
Hekate
Jun 2024
#31
Where in the Constitution does an Orginalist see reference to gun ACCESSORIES?
PeaceWave
Jun 2024
#35