Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
13. Unfortunately, Dean appears to be buying into the deficit hysteria to at least some extent.
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 09:19 PM
Nov 2012

He says the fiscal cliff isn't really all that bad because it will effect significant deficit reduction. That's the very reason it is bad. The standard Keynesian view is that the combination of tax increases and spending cuts will reduce aggregate demand and therefore either slow the already-tepid recovery or, even worse, push us back into recession.

Of course, Dean is right that going over the cliff would be better than some of the alternatives that are being bruited about. Nevertheless, it's a fundamental error to evaluate all the options -- the cliff and various anti-cliff deals -- solely or even primarily from the point of view of deficit reduction.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Krugman- The Con Goes On»Reply #13