Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marble falls

(72,527 posts)
6. She voted with the other three women on the court against the bumpstock, she's voted for disarming men ...
Wed Jun 19, 2024, 10:25 AM
Jun 2024

... arrested for abuse.

She's criticized Thomas in at least one opinion:

"Thomas wrote the majority opinion rejecting the trademark applicant’s claim. Barrett (and all the other justices) agreed with that bottom-line result. The quarrel came down to methodology.

In a concurring opinion, Barrett used unusually blunt terms to skewer Thomas’ history-based rationale for denying the trademark. She described his approach as “wrong twice over,” and she made clear that her gripes went far beyond this case alone."

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I will believe any of the six will do the right thing by BlueKota Jun 2024 #1
They are maga Walleye Jun 2024 #5
I agree but they answer to their masters and the GOP... S/V Loner Jun 2024 #11
I read she was disturbed about how radical state abortion legislation has affected women's access to healthcare. CrispyQ Jun 2024 #2
How does someone with a law degree not see such consequences ahead of time? Iris Jun 2024 #12
Dominionism is overwhelmingly blind to logic. More powerful than mere education. jaxexpat Jun 2024 #17
Good perspective. Iris Jun 2024 #22
Only if her sovereign lord and master husband approves . . . hatrack Jun 2024 #15
I hope this is so. As a person who has actually given birth multiple times, she understands what those men... Hekate Jun 2024 #21
..so strictly viewed.. thomski64 Jun 2024 #3
Or eliminate indigenous communities Voltaire2 Jun 2024 #8
I hold out no hope for this Supreme Court Walleye Jun 2024 #4
She voted with the other three women on the court against the bumpstock, she's voted for disarming men ... marble falls Jun 2024 #6
Honestly, she is probably the least crazy republican on the SC.. DemocratInPa Jun 2024 #13
I have zero confidence that any of the six sick fucks Voltaire2 Jun 2024 #7
What complete horseshit! maxrandb Jun 2024 #9
Yep, this. hatrack Jun 2024 #16
Hearing malaise Jun 2024 #10
zero chance she does the right thing for Americans ZonkerHarris Jun 2024 #14
I hope that some day that this hystericalism will be seen for what it is. Baitball Blogger Jun 2024 #18
SCOTUS has already shown they don't give a rat's ass about "legal precedent" FakeNoose Jun 2024 #19
At this point in my listening I'm impressed that Dreeben continues to remind the Justices that for 200+ years..... usaf-vet Jun 2024 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Amy Coney Barrett may be ...»Reply #6