Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

usaf-vet

(7,853 posts)
20. At this point in my listening I'm impressed that Dreeben continues to remind the Justices that for 200+ years.....
Wed Jun 19, 2024, 01:11 PM
Jun 2024

.....this has not been a problem that we have ever had to deal with until now, and he stops short of saying, "Trump is the problem."

I understand why he stops where he does, but Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch are definitely more interested in "Protecting Trump." than they are in the actual facts of this case, which is here ONLY because of the conman, criminal, and narcissistic personality disorder person in the individual of 45.

In my mind, Dreeben held our ground! Thank you! I hope his arguments don't fall on 6 sets of deaf ears.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I will believe any of the six will do the right thing by BlueKota Jun 2024 #1
They are maga Walleye Jun 2024 #5
I agree but they answer to their masters and the GOP... S/V Loner Jun 2024 #11
I read she was disturbed about how radical state abortion legislation has affected women's access to healthcare. CrispyQ Jun 2024 #2
How does someone with a law degree not see such consequences ahead of time? Iris Jun 2024 #12
Dominionism is overwhelmingly blind to logic. More powerful than mere education. jaxexpat Jun 2024 #17
Good perspective. Iris Jun 2024 #22
Only if her sovereign lord and master husband approves . . . hatrack Jun 2024 #15
I hope this is so. As a person who has actually given birth multiple times, she understands what those men... Hekate Jun 2024 #21
..so strictly viewed.. thomski64 Jun 2024 #3
Or eliminate indigenous communities Voltaire2 Jun 2024 #8
I hold out no hope for this Supreme Court Walleye Jun 2024 #4
She voted with the other three women on the court against the bumpstock, she's voted for disarming men ... marble falls Jun 2024 #6
Honestly, she is probably the least crazy republican on the SC.. DemocratInPa Jun 2024 #13
I have zero confidence that any of the six sick fucks Voltaire2 Jun 2024 #7
What complete horseshit! maxrandb Jun 2024 #9
Yep, this. hatrack Jun 2024 #16
Hearing malaise Jun 2024 #10
zero chance she does the right thing for Americans ZonkerHarris Jun 2024 #14
I hope that some day that this hystericalism will be seen for what it is. Baitball Blogger Jun 2024 #18
SCOTUS has already shown they don't give a rat's ass about "legal precedent" FakeNoose Jun 2024 #19
At this point in my listening I'm impressed that Dreeben continues to remind the Justices that for 200+ years..... usaf-vet Jun 2024 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Amy Coney Barrett may be ...»Reply #20