Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The purpose is to overturn precedent Uncle Eddie Jun 2024 #1
Exactly. Also, the SC can use its recent precedent . . . John1956PA Jun 2024 #3
Precedent when out the window when trmps 3 judges lied about it. spanone Jun 2024 #13
Exactly! No matter what recent conservative justices claimed in their confirmation hearings, elocs Jun 2024 #15
Why Louisiana's radical new law on Ten Commandments, schools matters LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2024 #2
Like Roe V Wade? The right to an abortion was there. Autumn Jun 2024 #4
Precisely!! SorellaLaBefana Jun 2024 #9
They are hell bent on tearing it all down and rebuild it to suit themselves. Autumn Jun 2024 #10
'Roe vs Wade are not the same separation of church and state. Roe vs Wade was decided on ... marble falls Jun 2024 #11
Not making Roe V Wade the law of the land was not a "mistake". It was kept a ruling because it Autumn Jun 2024 #16
Every action like this is an attempt/invitation to reverse existing precedents RockRaven Jun 2024 #5
posting them is a form of oppression against people with other spiritual beliefs (or none) nt msongs Jun 2024 #6
Hope you are correct, but 5-4 in 1980 caught my eye. Raven123 Jun 2024 #7
What if Traildogbob Jun 2024 #8
Alabama's Chief Judge Ordered to Remove Ten Commandments Monument from Courthouse marble falls Jun 2024 #12
You obviously have more faith in the current court Bettie Jun 2024 #14
Supreme Court backs push to remove Ten Commandments monument marble falls Jun 2024 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Ten Commandments and ...»Reply #4