Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marble falls

(72,528 posts)
12. Alabama's Chief Judge Ordered to Remove Ten Commandments Monument from Courthouse
Thu Jun 20, 2024, 05:33 PM
Jun 2024

Alabama's Chief Judge Ordered to Remove Ten Commandments Monument from Courthouse
Affiliate: ACLU of Alabama
November 18, 2002 12:00 am

media@aclu.org
(212) 549-2666
125 Broad Street
18th Floor
New York, NY 10004
United States

https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/alabamas-chief-judge-ordered-remove-ten-commandments-monument-courthouse

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

MONTGOMERY, AL — A monument to the Ten Commandments displayed on the grounds of the state judicial building here was ordered removed today by a federal district judge who said the display “crossed the line.”

“The federal court today vindicated the religious freedom of all Alabama citizens, not just those who share the Chief Justice’s views that a belief in a Christian God is the only real religion in Alabama,” said Rob Weinberg, a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Alabama, which along with other groups had challenged the display.

Following a seven-day trial, U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson gave Chief Justice Roy Moore 30 days to remove the two-and-a-half ton monument to the Judeo-Christian text he had erected last year in the rotunda of the State Judicial Building.

In a scholarly 79-page opinion, Judge Thompson rejected all of the Chief Justice’s arguments that his monument to the Ten Commandments was a legally permissible display that merely acknowledged God.

The ACLU and its clients had argued that the Judicial Building — which houses Alabama’s three highest courts of appeal — should be a place where profession of religious faith is not a prerequisite to seeking justice.

Moore made no apologies when he testified at trial that his display was specifically meant as a monument to the Judeo-Christian God and not directed at a God of any other religions.

The federal court held that Moore violated the Constitution when he “installed a two-and-a-half ton monument in the most prominent place in a government building, managed with dollars from all state taxpayers, with the specific purpose and effect of establishing a permanent recognition of the ‘sovereignty of God,’ the Judeo-Christian God, over all citizens in this country, regardless of each taxpaying citizen’s individual personal beliefs or lack thereof. To this, the Establishment clause says no.”

Two separate lawsuits, Glassroth v. Moore and Maddox et al. v. Moore, were filed on behalf of the three local attorneys by the ACLU, Americans United for Separation of Church and State and the Southern Poverty Law Center.

The decision in the case is online at http://www.almd.uscourts.gov/Opinions/index_of_opinions.htm

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The purpose is to overturn precedent Uncle Eddie Jun 2024 #1
Exactly. Also, the SC can use its recent precedent . . . John1956PA Jun 2024 #3
Precedent when out the window when trmps 3 judges lied about it. spanone Jun 2024 #13
Exactly! No matter what recent conservative justices claimed in their confirmation hearings, elocs Jun 2024 #15
Why Louisiana's radical new law on Ten Commandments, schools matters LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2024 #2
Like Roe V Wade? The right to an abortion was there. Autumn Jun 2024 #4
Precisely!! SorellaLaBefana Jun 2024 #9
They are hell bent on tearing it all down and rebuild it to suit themselves. Autumn Jun 2024 #10
'Roe vs Wade are not the same separation of church and state. Roe vs Wade was decided on ... marble falls Jun 2024 #11
Not making Roe V Wade the law of the land was not a "mistake". It was kept a ruling because it Autumn Jun 2024 #16
Every action like this is an attempt/invitation to reverse existing precedents RockRaven Jun 2024 #5
posting them is a form of oppression against people with other spiritual beliefs (or none) nt msongs Jun 2024 #6
Hope you are correct, but 5-4 in 1980 caught my eye. Raven123 Jun 2024 #7
What if Traildogbob Jun 2024 #8
Alabama's Chief Judge Ordered to Remove Ten Commandments Monument from Courthouse marble falls Jun 2024 #12
You obviously have more faith in the current court Bettie Jun 2024 #14
Supreme Court backs push to remove Ten Commandments monument marble falls Jun 2024 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Ten Commandments and ...»Reply #12