Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democracyinkind

(4,015 posts)
21. Further information...
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 10:00 AM
Nov 2012

We voted on this back in March... It was 52.6% yes to 47.4%. About 40% of eligible voters cast their ballots. This measure came before the people because our local version of the Republicans, the SVP, couldn't fathom that the city council was "openly promoting prostitution" (although it's a legal trade here).

Unsurprisingly, the people that actually live in the part of town where it will be built rejected the proposition (64% no, 36% yes).

The area were this is going to be implemented is right next to the train tracks, rather at the outskirts of Zurich.

This is not a definitive project. They're going to build something there, sooner or later. The project, as voted on, is meant to last for 10 years. Then the city will assess what effect it had and consider installing a long-term version somewhere else.

I couldn't find the cost of it all just now, but the City believes that it will be paying about 550'000 Swiss francs a year (exchange rate more or less 1:1 nowadays) to maintain it (counselors for the sex workers, security, repairs, clean up).

The whole measure was put on the ballot because on-street sex working has become rampant within 3 parts of the city due to our new arrangement with the EU (Switzerland is not a member), which allows any EU citizen to come to Switzerland to work. The women that sell themselves on the street are predominantly from eastern Europe (Romania and Hungary) and are almost exclusively gypsies (german: Roma, I don't know the PC word in english) in their ethnic makeup. The situation as it is now (pre-boxes) has the city in a furor, and that was the primary motivation to get this project running.

Cities in the Netherlands (Utrecht) and Germany ( Essen, Cologne) have been the pioneers of this, and that's where the idea came from.

Local sex-worker advocates are supportive of the whole measure, but they insist that these boxes are not ideal for every kind of sex worker and they have urged the police to not ramp up actions against those sex workers who want to (or have to) keep working the streets.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How efficient. hedda_foil Nov 2012 #1
There is no end to what you can do with those small European cars. Warren DeMontague Nov 2012 #2
"first-come-first-served basis" seems backward to me jberryhill Nov 2012 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author Vattel Dec 2012 #32
It's putting the car before the ho. UnrepentantLiberal Dec 2012 #33
Imagine the sounds and smells coming from that part of town. Tutonic Nov 2012 #4
And will they have a name? SoapBox Nov 2012 #5
Lol- ErikJ Nov 2012 #6
"Verrichtungsboxen" Democracyinkind Nov 2012 #9
so prostitution being legal was making things bad for people ? JI7 Nov 2012 #7
2 perspectives Democracyinkind Nov 2012 #10
Swiss and their cleaning mania ;) tama Nov 2012 #13
I used to work for a small company... Democracyinkind Nov 2012 #17
I'll say tama Nov 2012 #22
zurich has an inner city? when did the open drug scene thing begin? HiPointDem Nov 2012 #14
Qualified inner city I guess. Democracyinkind Nov 2012 #15
it wasnt that cheap, even then. it was the most expensive of all the places we went, HiPointDem Nov 2012 #16
Hey, if the details ever come back to you.. PM me.. Democracyinkind Nov 2012 #19
ya. but we like to pretend legalized prostitution makes everything "pretty woman". reality., seabeyond Nov 2012 #24
"I'll have the Hypocrisy SPECIAL, with a side of Super Kink." - Republicans (R) Berlum Nov 2012 #8
Without commenting on the issue of prostitution per se, this seems like a valid form nomorenomore08 Nov 2012 #11
"drive-in sex box" name not needed Nov 2012 #12
If you order something special will you have to pull ahead and wait? CBGLuthier Nov 2012 #18
So many punchlines, so little time! Jeff In Milwaukee Nov 2012 #20
Further information... Democracyinkind Nov 2012 #21
The polite word is Roma in English too. LeftyMom Nov 2012 #28
So there is going to be security provided? LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #29
Like a drive-thru? "I didn't get enough sauce for my nuggets!" "You didn't properly toss my salad!" Poll_Blind Nov 2012 #23
yippee. chuckle chuckle. giggle giggle. nt seabeyond Nov 2012 #25
The juvenility in this thread, and on gender/sex related issues on DU in general, is quite striking Democracyinkind Dec 2012 #31
yes. the juvenility is very telling. but, then, when it is about using women, seabeyond Dec 2012 #34
I've seen small vans with a woman on a mattress in the back, and LeftinOH Nov 2012 #26
What will the rich "religious" types do? bongbong Nov 2012 #27
"Honey, I'm just going to the bank" LadyHawkAZ Nov 2012 #30
No to Baby boxes, yes to Sex boxes? undeterred Dec 2012 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Zurich to open drive-in p...»Reply #21