Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No matter what one feels about Jamaal Bowman, and I might have voted against him had I lived in his CD [View all]lapucelle
(21,061 posts)159. County Executive Latimer supported the bill.
Bowman takes heat from local Dems for voting against Biden's bipartisan infrastructure bill
Westchester Democrats were largely left disappointed by U.S. Rep. Jamaal Bowmans vote against the bipartisan infrastructure bill Friday that is expected to bring billions of dollars to New York once President Joe Biden signs it into law. The $1.2 trillion package, formally know as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, will go toward upgrading roads and bridges, airports, public transit and water systems. Biden called it a monumental step forward as a nation.
But Bowman, along with five other progressive congressional Democrats, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, rejected the bill. Part of Bowman's district covers Yonkers, New Rochelle, Mount Vernon and other towns in the southern portion of the county.
snip-----------------------------------------
Legislator Catherine Parker (D-Rye) said the bill Bowman opposed will provide good opportunities to address a myriad of local infrastructure needs. I felt (Bowman's) protest vote spoke more of his unwillingness to accept compromise than actually accomplishing anything, Parker said in a statement. Greenburgh Supervisor Paul Feiner's called Bowman's decision "irresponsible." Bowman's district covers part of the town.
Westchester County Executive George Latimer took a softer tone. The Democrat said he supports the bill, though he noted, "Congressman Bowman is a friend and friends disagree sometimes on issues."
Westchester Democrats were largely left disappointed by U.S. Rep. Jamaal Bowmans vote against the bipartisan infrastructure bill Friday that is expected to bring billions of dollars to New York once President Joe Biden signs it into law. The $1.2 trillion package, formally know as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, will go toward upgrading roads and bridges, airports, public transit and water systems. Biden called it a monumental step forward as a nation.
But Bowman, along with five other progressive congressional Democrats, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, rejected the bill. Part of Bowman's district covers Yonkers, New Rochelle, Mount Vernon and other towns in the southern portion of the county.
snip-----------------------------------------
Legislator Catherine Parker (D-Rye) said the bill Bowman opposed will provide good opportunities to address a myriad of local infrastructure needs. I felt (Bowman's) protest vote spoke more of his unwillingness to accept compromise than actually accomplishing anything, Parker said in a statement. Greenburgh Supervisor Paul Feiner's called Bowman's decision "irresponsible." Bowman's district covers part of the town.
Westchester County Executive George Latimer took a softer tone. The Democrat said he supports the bill, though he noted, "Congressman Bowman is a friend and friends disagree sometimes on issues."
https://www.lohud.com/story/news/local/westchester/2021/11/09/jamaal-bowman-takes-heat-westchester-democrats-no-vote-infrastructure-bill/6338487001/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
169 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No matter what one feels about Jamaal Bowman, and I might have voted against him had I lived in his CD [View all]
dsc
Jun 2024
OP
It was money well spent. Any candidate who denies Hamas rape attacks, engages in 9/11 truther nonsense, votes against
tritsofme
Jun 2024
#2
He voted with MAGA Republicans against Biden's policy. He basically lost 60/40.
emulatorloo
Jun 2024
#7
Nobody is disputing that NY-16 is blue either. It's a Biden +51.5 district. N/T
lapucelle
Jun 2024
#149
That's fine with me. Democrats will hold NY-14, 15, and 16. It's NY-17 that we need to flip.
lapucelle
Jun 2024
#167
My point is that it is inaccurate to say that AOC's district is in the Bronx.
lapucelle
Jun 2024
#160
Before you did research you said that AOC grew up in Westchester and I answered "So", her district is in NYC...
brush
Jun 2024
#162
I think his problem is that they were NOT constituency based, and his constituency didn't like it.
Dorian Gray
Jun 2024
#20
Do you have any evidence for that claim? Clearly, Clyburn had to whip GOP crossover votes
lapucelle
Jun 2024
#153
The infrastructure bill did not include tax increases. That was a Republican talking point.
lapucelle
Jun 2024
#168
I think that's what Ace was saying that he would have lost even without AIPAC's contributions NT
AZSkiffyGeek
Jun 2024
#29
They are a lobbying organization with one issue - supporting Israel. So you would be ok when
Nanjeanne
Jun 2024
#46
That is a different argument, I responded to the false comparison of AIPAC to Putin's interference.
tritsofme
Jun 2024
#50
AIPAC is made up US Citizens and IS NOT a foreign government. Surely you know this and understand
emulatorloo
Jun 2024
#40
I agree completely, which is why I would never do such a thing. But that is great advice in general!
tritsofme
Jun 2024
#86
False. His opponent was as well known as he was. HE blew it with his attitude.
oldsoftie
Jun 2024
#63
Bowman voted 94% on Biden's agenda. The votes where he differed are some that were expected and
Nanjeanne
Jun 2024
#11
He lost essentially by 60/40. No amount of money causes an effective incumbent rep to lose by that much.
emulatorloo
Jun 2024
#30
Oh please. Smear fellow DUers. By saying I was disappointed in the fact that lobbying money is
Nanjeanne
Jun 2024
#43
You wrote it, Nanejeanne. You clearly stated DU'ers are cheering an "assault on democracy"
emulatorloo
Jun 2024
#48
Yes. Constituents were unhappy with the status quo. Happens in politics. No need for elaborate money conspiracies.
betsuni
Jun 2024
#109
In May, Nihad Awad hosted a high dollar fundraiser for Bowman at a private home in VA.
lapucelle
Jun 2024
#57
Really really strange. Would love an explanation. Maybe site owners could untangle what just happened.
emulatorloo
Jun 2024
#104
I doubt they have much reason, this is a D+20 district, the Democratic primary is the final word.
tritsofme
Jun 2024
#16
Kind of hard to reconcile with President Biden and Leader Jeffries being amongst AIPAC's largest recipients.
tritsofme
Jun 2024
#76
That is ridiculous. Latimer is not Joe Manchin. And I sure as hell wish we still had Joe...the Senate is looking tough
Demsrule86
Jun 2024
#39
Bowman ddn't pull the fire alarm? The vote wasn't delayed because the Capitol was evacuated?
AZSkiffyGeek
Jun 2024
#91
The money was because of Bowman's unpopular views. There is a large percentage of Jewish Americans in that district.
Demsrule86
Jun 2024
#38
What you say is true, but I understand over $20 million was spent for Latimer to win.
patphil
Jun 2024
#45
That is not Latimer's fault...Bowman was unpopular...in an area which has a substantial number of Jewish voters, he
Demsrule86
Jun 2024
#58
Primaries are two way streets...Progressives have primaryed sitting Democrats which annoys me but is their right.
Demsrule86
Jun 2024
#36
I find it odd that people decry Latimer primarying Bowman because "you don't primary Democrats"
AZSkiffyGeek
Jun 2024
#42
There are all manner of conclusions one can draw from Bowman's loss and the money invested to defeat him, but....
jaxexpat
Jun 2024
#61
The conclusion I draw from such info is that AIPAC has money enough to budget some on needless(?) insurance.
jaxexpat
Jun 2024
#92
Yes, I know that there is a difference between an assumption and a deduction.
lapucelle
Jun 2024
#113
I have the answer. AIPAC doesn't support / endorse / raise money for presidential candidates. N/T
lapucelle
Jun 2024
#127
AIPAC doesn't support / endorse / raise money for presidential candidates. N/T
lapucelle
Jun 2024
#121
A day without a conspiracy theory accusing Democrats of evil right-wing motivations is like a day without sunshine.
betsuni
Jun 2024
#128
I was waiting for it, but he probably remembered Katie Porter's rigged comment.
betsuni
Jun 2024
#112
Now we're just calling it "Jewish money"? The veils have really come off lately.
tritsofme
Jun 2024
#90
The magic word "grassroots" purifies money,. THEY are corrupted by (repeat long list of evil enemies & villains).
betsuni
Jun 2024
#117
The lack of gracious winning in a Democratic primary has been pretty gross
Prairie Gates
Jun 2024
#114
Bowman and the squad were elected through the use of dark money sources
LetMyPeopleVote
Jun 2024
#118