Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NYT admits partisan non-response is source for Trump's lead in poll [View all]Fiendish Thingy
(23,478 posts)41. It is not standard or statistically valid
Reweighting is an opaque, often proprietary tool that varies from pollster to pollster and is not scientific, but instead based on the best guesses to obtain the most valid sample.
If you dont believe me, go to the Siena website and copy and paste the formula they use to reweight the sample; Ill wait here.
(hint: you wont find the formula; the most you will find is some non-transparent reference to some parameters/guidelines they use)
partisan non-response doesnt seem to be as big an issue for other pollsters this year.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
NYT admits partisan non-response is source for Trump's lead in poll [View all]
Fiendish Thingy
Jun 2024
OP
If they know it they should attempt to quantify it & statistically adjust for it.
CaptainTruth
Jun 2024
#1
You are still completely ignoring the concern the potential error the NYT identified:
Ms. Toad
Jun 2024
#38
Lack of transparency means the reliability of the methodology cannot be independently verified
Fiendish Thingy
Jun 2024
#46
There's an entire field of mathematics dedicated to exactly things like this.
CaptainTruth
Jun 2024
#54
But in the most accurate way? "we weight the results by party registration" is not the best way.
CaptainTruth
Jun 2024
#50
And they (NYT) has lost all creditability now. But, I think they were already well on their way of losing it long
SWBTATTReg
Jun 2024
#4
True. Fascists and Fundamentalists have always had that advantage: they tend to be more committed
peppertree
Jun 2024
#8
Yep. Interrupt their script & INSIST on knowing who commissioned/paid for the poll
Attilatheblond
Jun 2024
#19
I get that, but I still ask and will not listen to anything if they don't have an answer
Attilatheblond
Jun 2024
#39
And that's why the only poll that matters is the one on the first Tuesday of November.
paleotn
Jun 2024
#13
I have been saying that for a long time, Democrats do not like to answer polls, and that is why I believe trump
Escurumbele
Jun 2024
#15