Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bruce Bartlett: Revenge of the Reality-Based Community-My life on the Republican right & and how... [View all]JHB
(38,073 posts)26. He's getting closer, but still won't admit he's still missing some points:
(link to Bartlett's article rather than commentary on it):
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/revenge-of-the-reality-based-community/
If Republicans could only increase their share of the black vote from 10 percent, which it had been since Goldwater, to the 30 percent level that Dwight Eisenhower enjoyed, it would have major electoral ramifications.
The best way to get Republicans to read a book about reaching out for the black vote, I thought, was to detail the Democratic Partys long history of maltreatment of blacks. After all, the party was based in the South for 100 years after the war, and all of the ugly racism we associate with that region was enacted and enforced by Democratic politicians. I was surprised that such a book didnt already exist.
I thought knowing the Democratic Partys pre-1964 history of racism, which is indisputable, would give Republicans a story to tell when they went before black groups to solicit votes. I thought it would also make Republicans more sympathetic to the problems of the black community, many of which are historical in their origins. Analyses by economists and sociologists show that historical racism still holds back African-Americans even though it has diminished radically since the 1960s.
So I wrote Wrong on Race: The Democratic Partys Buried Past. Unfortunately, it was published the day Barack Obama won the Iowa caucuses. But I still held out hope that Hillary Clinton, who was pandering to the white working class in unsubtle racial terms, would capture the Democratic nomination. The anger among blacks at having the nomination effectively stolen from Obama would make them highly receptive to GOP outreach, I believed. I even met with John McCains staff about this.
The best way to get Republicans to read a book about reaching out for the black vote, I thought, was to detail the Democratic Partys long history of maltreatment of blacks. After all, the party was based in the South for 100 years after the war, and all of the ugly racism we associate with that region was enacted and enforced by Democratic politicians. I was surprised that such a book didnt already exist.
I thought knowing the Democratic Partys pre-1964 history of racism, which is indisputable, would give Republicans a story to tell when they went before black groups to solicit votes. I thought it would also make Republicans more sympathetic to the problems of the black community, many of which are historical in their origins. Analyses by economists and sociologists show that historical racism still holds back African-Americans even though it has diminished radically since the 1960s.
So I wrote Wrong on Race: The Democratic Partys Buried Past. Unfortunately, it was published the day Barack Obama won the Iowa caucuses. But I still held out hope that Hillary Clinton, who was pandering to the white working class in unsubtle racial terms, would capture the Democratic nomination. The anger among blacks at having the nomination effectively stolen from Obama would make them highly receptive to GOP outreach, I believed. I even met with John McCains staff about this.
The problem with his book wasn't that it Obama's win buried it. It's that the premise ignores the most important reason for the shift in black voting:
The Republican party actively recruited the racist wing of the Democratic party, and they've done it for just about Bartlett's entire lifetime. Guys like William F. Buckley supported "states rights" and nostrums about black inferiority even while trying to beat back the Bircher anti-semites for the definition of conservativism. If he could get conservative jews and conservative southerners on board he could have a conservative ascendancy.
This was made explicit by Nixon's "Southern Strategy." Reagan didn't hesitate to play to racists to gain support, he just knew to use code words to pretend he he wasn't. The rise of Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh to leadership positions (official and unofficial) guaranteed that the Republicans would continue to play toward the worst elements.
And if you don't think other people already know this, maybe you still have some more rethinking to do.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bruce Bartlett: Revenge of the Reality-Based Community-My life on the Republican right & and how... [View all]
Faryn Balyncd
Nov 2012
OP
Wow. Someone willing to think for himself instead of blindly follow someone else's ideology.
randome
Nov 2012
#1
Anyone Democrat thinks that Obama is some sort of left-winger is as delusional...
truebrit71
Nov 2012
#3
It's peculiar that a lot of those who think Obama is a liberal just loathe anyone to Obama's left
Fumesucker
Nov 2012
#5
That's because Sanders is very clear on issues that directly affect the American people.
sabrina 1
Nov 2012
#17
Yeah, but the US has had _two_ screaming rightist presidents, arguably three if you count GHWB
Fumesucker
Nov 2012
#7
If we tend to elect all those "center" representatives, why do we end up with such a RW government?
Vincardog
Nov 2012
#21
I disagreed with many of Bartlett's points, but I found him coming around refreshing.
apnu
Nov 2012
#25
I've always maintained that with Clinton, Democrats took a hard right and stayed there.
TalkingDog
Nov 2012
#43
Well liberals always knew Obama truly was more of a blue dog dem. Not a surprise to
southernyankeebelle
Nov 2012
#12
True. So like good Liberals, we keep our views and relish the time we get a bit of a pendulum swing
libdem4life
Nov 2012
#20
Excellent point. If the right could stay away from the social issues and try to outreach
southernyankeebelle
Nov 2012
#27
A pendulum that swings from hard right to slightly right of center isn't really much of a pendulum
Fumesucker
Nov 2012
#30
The Hard Right would state it completely opposite...I have it on good knowledge.
libdem4life
Nov 2012
#35
The hard right think Obama is a communist, hardly an accurate observation of reality
Fumesucker
Nov 2012
#42
Back in the day ... 1970-72 ... McGovern was a way far lefty Everyone back then...until we anti-war
libdem4life
Nov 2012
#44
Great excerpts. Thanks for posting! Bookmarked. Recommended without hesitation. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2012
#15
Obviously you have not read the article that the links lead to. Bartlett is right about
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2012
#23
When you refer to 'just selling books' (paraphrased) you refer to central thesis which is not Obama.
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2012
#49
You are picking on the straw that broke the camel's back, not the Republican load of BS that
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2012
#51
Well Obama is far from being a Liberal. And he doesn't seem to have much time for the Progressive
sabrina 1
Dec 2012
#57
You seem to be afraid to read the article, perhaps because of where it is located. That is just like
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2012
#58
We need many many more of these gop turncoats who have seen the light
Dont call me Shirley
Nov 2012
#22
Obama is neither Liberal or Republican. He is a pragmatist. He works to get compromise.
ray of light
Nov 2012
#29
More Proof that the extreme RW is swinging a bit left. Pat Robertson is the CF of that equation.
libdem4life
Nov 2012
#39
This guy isn't really even a GOP turncoat... he's just showing how extreme they've become.
reformist2
Dec 2012
#60
