Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JHB

(38,073 posts)
26. He's getting closer, but still won't admit he's still missing some points:
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 03:28 PM
Nov 2012

(link to Bartlett's article rather than commentary on it):
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/revenge-of-the-reality-based-community/

If Republicans could only increase their share of the black vote from 10 percent, which it had been since Goldwater, to the 30 percent level that Dwight Eisenhower enjoyed, it would have major electoral ramifications.

The best way to get Republicans to read a book about reaching out for the black vote, I thought, was to detail the Democratic Party’s long history of maltreatment of blacks. After all, the party was based in the South for 100 years after the war, and all of the ugly racism we associate with that region was enacted and enforced by Democratic politicians. I was surprised that such a book didn’t already exist.

I thought knowing the Democratic Party’s pre-1964 history of racism, which is indisputable, would give Republicans a story to tell when they went before black groups to solicit votes. I thought it would also make Republicans more sympathetic to the problems of the black community, many of which are historical in their origins. Analyses by economists and sociologists show that historical racism still holds back African-Americans even though it has diminished radically since the 1960s.

So I wrote Wrong on Race: The Democratic Party’s Buried Past. Unfortunately, it was published the day Barack Obama won the Iowa caucuses. But I still held out hope that Hillary Clinton, who was pandering to the white working class in unsubtle racial terms, would capture the Democratic nomination. The anger among blacks at having the nomination effectively stolen from Obama would make them highly receptive to GOP outreach, I believed. I even met with John McCain’s staff about this.


The problem with his book wasn't that it Obama's win buried it. It's that the premise ignores the most important reason for the shift in black voting:

The Republican party actively recruited the racist wing of the Democratic party, and they've done it for just about Bartlett's entire lifetime. Guys like William F. Buckley supported "states rights" and nostrums about black inferiority even while trying to beat back the Bircher anti-semites for the definition of conservativism. If he could get conservative jews and conservative southerners on board he could have a conservative ascendancy.

This was made explicit by Nixon's "Southern Strategy." Reagan didn't hesitate to play to racists to gain support, he just knew to use code words to pretend he he wasn't. The rise of Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh to leadership positions (official and unofficial) guaranteed that the Republicans would continue to play toward the worst elements.

And if you don't think other people already know this, maybe you still have some more rethinking to do.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wow. Someone willing to think for himself instead of blindly follow someone else's ideology. randome Nov 2012 #1
He's going to be very unpopular with certain elements here on DU Fumesucker Nov 2012 #2
Anyone Democrat thinks that Obama is some sort of left-winger is as delusional... truebrit71 Nov 2012 #3
It's peculiar that a lot of those who think Obama is a liberal just loathe anyone to Obama's left Fumesucker Nov 2012 #5
anyone who thinks Obama is a liberal adieu Nov 2012 #14
CORRECT Skittles Dec 2012 #55
Well, I guess I'm clueless. PragmaticLiberal Dec 2012 #61
Look at the votes of Sen. Bernie Sanders, a real, actual Socialist. Ikonoklast Nov 2012 #9
That's because Sanders is very clear on issues that directly affect the American people. sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #17
+100000 noiretextatique Nov 2012 #32
The term "historical context" is particularly important. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2012 #6
Yeah, but the US has had _two_ screaming rightist presidents, arguably three if you count GHWB Fumesucker Nov 2012 #7
If we tend to elect all those "center" representatives, why do we end up with such a RW government? Vincardog Nov 2012 #21
I disagreed with many of Bartlett's points, but I found him coming around refreshing. apnu Nov 2012 #25
Obama at his most liberal is an Eisenhower Democrat, JDPriestly Dec 2012 #65
I don't particularly agree with him on that but it's a valid viewpoint. randome Nov 2012 #31
I've always maintained that with Clinton, Democrats took a hard right and stayed there. TalkingDog Nov 2012 #43
In the International neighborhood of "Civilized Countries", bvar22 Dec 2012 #63
excellent article, thank you for bringing it. hollysmom Nov 2012 #4
Thanks, Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #8
A great find! Thanks and keep 'em coming! K & R freshwest Nov 2012 #10
Thank you! Segami Nov 2012 #11
Well liberals always knew Obama truly was more of a blue dog dem. Not a surprise to southernyankeebelle Nov 2012 #12
True. So like good Liberals, we keep our views and relish the time we get a bit of a pendulum swing libdem4life Nov 2012 #20
Excellent point. If the right could stay away from the social issues and try to outreach southernyankeebelle Nov 2012 #27
A pendulum that swings from hard right to slightly right of center isn't really much of a pendulum Fumesucker Nov 2012 #30
The Hard Right would state it completely opposite...I have it on good knowledge. libdem4life Nov 2012 #35
The hard right think Obama is a communist, hardly an accurate observation of reality Fumesucker Nov 2012 #42
Back in the day ... 1970-72 ... McGovern was a way far lefty Everyone back then...until we anti-war libdem4life Nov 2012 #44
Bush sold fear and militarism to enhance his "cult of personality" Kolesar Nov 2012 #13
Great excerpts. Thanks for posting! Bookmarked. Recommended without hesitation. nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2012 #15
It takes a big person LondonReign2 Nov 2012 #16
I call this BULSHIT! Hutzpa Nov 2012 #18
Obviously you have not read the article that the links lead to. Bartlett is right about Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2012 #23
I'm calling bullshit to their or Bartletts' theory Hutzpa Nov 2012 #45
When you refer to 'just selling books' (paraphrased) you refer to central thesis which is not Obama. Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2012 #49
This is what I'm responding to Hutzpa Nov 2012 #50
You are picking on the straw that broke the camel's back, not the Republican load of BS that Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2012 #51
We all know republicans believe in their own BS Hutzpa Nov 2012 #52
I take it that you believe the president to be a true liberal. reusrename Dec 2012 #56
Well Obama is far from being a Liberal. And he doesn't seem to have much time for the Progressive sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #57
You seem to be afraid to read the article, perhaps because of where it is located. That is just like Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2012 #58
His Sec of Ag is Vilsack BlueToTheBone Dec 2012 #59
The Republicans have ceded reality CJCRANE Nov 2012 #19
We need many many more of these gop turncoats who have seen the light Dont call me Shirley Nov 2012 #22
Reality therapy for Tea Partiers and Faux fans: Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2012 #24
He's getting closer, but still won't admit he's still missing some points: JHB Nov 2012 #26
absolutely noiretextatique Nov 2012 #33
Thank you. nt Hutzpa Nov 2012 #46
Yes, there's still something "off" about his idea... CJCRANE Nov 2012 #34
^^^ THIS ^^^ Hutzpa Nov 2012 #47
It is shocking when a Repub or ex-Repub publicly stands up hifiguy Nov 2012 #28
Obama is neither Liberal or Republican. He is a pragmatist. He works to get compromise. ray of light Nov 2012 #29
And LBJ and FDR .. sendero Nov 2012 #37
He's not a Pragmatist Hydra Nov 2012 #40
Fantasic article.. sendero Nov 2012 #36
Has he denounced Ayn Rand? Did I miss something? SleeplessinSoCal Nov 2012 #38
More Proof that the extreme RW is swinging a bit left. Pat Robertson is the CF of that equation. libdem4life Nov 2012 #39
It's Nice When Ex Righties See The Light colsohlibgal Nov 2012 #41
kick bloomington-lib Nov 2012 #48
Fascinating article, BUT... markpkessinger Nov 2012 #53
BRUCE NAILS IT!!!! Skittles Dec 2012 #54
This guy isn't really even a GOP turncoat... he's just showing how extreme they've become. reformist2 Dec 2012 #60
Slow learners. /nt Festivito Dec 2012 #62
How Republican is this thinking? JDPriestly Dec 2012 #64
Keynes continues to be validated rudycantfail Dec 2012 #66
Nice amuse bouche Dec 2012 #67
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bruce Bartlett: Revenge o...»Reply #26