Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(22,456 posts)

10. yes, there would first have to be...

Mon Jul 1, 2024, 09:41 AM

Jul 2024

...some kind of trial to determine if any particular act is "official" or "unofficial".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

deleted [View all] Tripper11 Jul 2024 OP

Time for an official Gitmo rendition of the fat fuck unweird Jul 2024 #1

Your post is false and should be deleted Fiendish Thingy Jul 2024 #2

You didn't read the entire ruling. brooklynite Jul 2024 #3

That's not what the ruling was. bearsfootball516 Jul 2024 #4

No immunity for UNofficial acts. Think. Again. Jul 2024 #5

Sounds like it, but probably a catch to it. Irish_Dem Jul 2024 #8

yes, there would first have to be... Think. Again. Jul 2024 #10

Would be taken up to the SC who would rule everything is official. Irish_Dem Jul 2024 #11

I would think it's good, but now the lower courts Buns_of_Fire Jul 2024 #9

Wrong. ismnotwasm Jul 2024 #6

Delete your false post. emulatorloo Jul 2024 #7