Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

intrepidity

(8,590 posts)

5. Bingo

Reply to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #1)

Mon Jul 1, 2024, 12:13 PM

Jul 2024

You seized upon the crux: courts will be called upon to decide, and any adverse decisions will be appealed all the way to SCOTUS, who seem to slways find a way. So Biden must appoint more SC justices.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Aepps22

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So... the immunity ruling... what changed here? [View all] Takket Jul 2024 OP

Think about who gets the ultimately decide what is and is not an official act Eliot Rosewater Jul 2024 #1

But about those documents - refusing to return them promptly, RandomNumbers Jul 2024 #4

Your mistake is you're using logic and the law, Supreme Court no longer does Eliot Rosewater Jul 2024 #7

Bingo intrepidity Jul 2024 #5

Not missing anything DarthDem Jul 2024 #2

. DarthDem Jul 2024 #3

it reamins to be seen bigtree Jul 2024 #6

How is a speech to the public not an official act? Goodheart Jul 2024 #8

What I find unsettling is Roberts' comment on what can be used as evidence to determine official versus unofficial. Lonestarblue Jul 2024 #9

Ah. Okay thank you Takket Jul 2024 #10

Question, Who determines whether an act is official act or it is unofficial act ? republianmushroom Jul 2024 #11