Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(1,378 posts)

1. That might cause more problems than it'd solve

Mon Jul 1, 2024, 12:33 PM

Jul 2024

Then a crazed District Court (say Kacsmaryk), that is even to the right of the Supreme Court, would never get decisions overturned.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

SCOTUS decisions should require unanimity [View all] intrepidity Jul 2024 OP

That might cause more problems than it'd solve ITAL Jul 2024 #1

Disagree.nt intrepidity Jul 2024 #4

What happens if.... ITAL Jul 2024 #7

If this were the requirement, intrepidity Jul 2024 #9

Even moderates can disagree ITAL Jul 2024 #10

Remand things back to Congress pwb Jul 2024 #2

I suspect that it doesn't matter anymore. Think. Again. Jul 2024 #3

So, no marriage equality ruling? brooklynite Jul 2024 #5

Many things would be different if unanimity were required intrepidity Jul 2024 #6

Congress could pass a law requiring that. Cattledog Jul 2024 #8