Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(115,401 posts)
13. So, it is remanded back to Judge Chutkan and the Appeals Court?
Mon Jul 1, 2024, 12:55 PM
Jul 2024

Can she not immediately call for a trial, with directions to the jury that a president cannot be charged for official duties of his office, and that it is up to the discretion of the jury about what is "official" and what is "private"?

Knowing beforehand that the former criminal-in-chief will appeal it to the Supreme Court, and that the Supreme Court will have to clarify once and for all what is criminal and what is not?

Judge Chutkan's hands should not be tied with an ambiguous ruling such as this from the Imperial Supreme Court.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So, you disagree with the 3 "liberal" justices? intrepidity Jul 2024 #1
He's just here to lay some truth on us plebs BannonsLiver Jul 2024 #8
Op made a reasonable point PatSeg Jul 2024 #11
Start a fan club then. BannonsLiver Jul 2024 #12
No thanks PatSeg Jul 2024 #15
I'm in n/t Polybius Jul 2024 #20
Except the dissenting opinion criticizes the actual decision intrepidity Jul 2024 #14
Understandable PatSeg Jul 2024 #16
In broad terms, I agree, however Fiendish Thingy Jul 2024 #2
+1 dalton99a Jul 2024 #9
Bullshit. Think. Again. Jul 2024 #3
there is another possibility rampartc Jul 2024 #4
Yes, but Trump hasn't "broken the law"..... brooklynite Jul 2024 #6
Nonsense Goodheart Jul 2024 #5
Question SARose Jul 2024 #7
Basically agree. We tend to -- and I guess have to -- look at things in the context of does it help/hurt trump. Silent Type Jul 2024 #10
So, it is remanded back to Judge Chutkan and the Appeals Court? kentuck Jul 2024 #13
"This is a devastating blow to our system of government." LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2024 #17
More from the dissent ScratchCat Jul 2024 #18
Different "reality" check maxrandb Jul 2024 #19
Thank you for cutting through the focus-group-speak bullshit. harumph Jul 2024 #22
So, OPEN and SHUT ruling? bluestarone Jul 2024 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reality check: this was t...»Reply #13