Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Vehl

(1,915 posts)
2. If Tech patents awarded by the USPTO are any indication...
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 07:55 PM
Nov 2012

The USPTO sucks big time at checking for prior art...and even if prior art exists, a simple change of wording is more than enough for a patent to be awarded...thanks to today's broken patent system.

How did Apple end up with patents for rectangles with rounded corners and a grid of icons...not to mention certain touchscreen actions. They all have prior art. The way the Patent system works right now is that they award patents almost by default..and let companies fight over prior art in the courts..costing taxpayers billions..not to mention stifled innovation and bullied small-companies. For example, Grid of icons existed in both computer OS's and even mobile OS's prior to the Iphone. However Apple filed for a patent, got it...and is now suing the shit out of everyone else for this "innovation".

The mere fact that the Appeals Courts thought that basic human genes could be patent-able speaks volumes about the quality of the judges and the patent system in the country.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court to rule on ...»Reply #2