Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(3,426 posts)

17. Nemo iudex in causa sua

Sun Jul 7, 2024, 10:05 AM

Jul 2024

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did the Supreme Court extra-legally amend the Constitution? [View all] V850i Jul 2024 OP

Jefferson, markodochartaigh Jul 2024 #8

what he said is hardly a compliment to the judges Celerity Jul 2024 #9

Exactly my point. markodochartaigh Jul 2024 #30

Thanks foe the 2 President's opinions. KS Toronado Jul 2024 #15

THIS malaise Jul 2024 #16

It really doesn't matter what people call it. Mike Niendorff Jul 2024 #2

I agree. Think. Again. Jul 2024 #11

Absolutely. In January, after the overwhelming Blue Wave has been seated Seeking Serenity Jul 2024 #13

The current SC would rule 9-0 to overturn MichMan Jul 2024 #29

The immunity question is derived from English Common Law Sympthsical Jul 2024 #3

So the court took a law that would pertain to a king in a monarchy... Think. Again. Jul 2024 #12

No Sympthsical Jul 2024 #14

Nemo iudex in causa sua harumph Jul 2024 #17

An important principle Sympthsical Jul 2024 #18

I see, so the court referred to laws... Think. Again. Jul 2024 #20

It's how our system of law works Sympthsical Jul 2024 #23

hmmm... Think. Again. Jul 2024 #24

It's the exact opposite of that Sympthsical Jul 2024 #25

When facing a question that has no precedent... Think. Again. Jul 2024 #26

And they typically don't Sympthsical Jul 2024 #27

This ruling can not stand. Think. Again. Jul 2024 #28

Much of our law has it's roots in the English common law . n/t Ms. Toad Jul 2024 #22

This case seems different from anything I've seen before because V850i Jul 2024 #19

It's just how American law works Sympthsical Jul 2024 #21

Knr UTUSN Jul 2024 #4

No, not in this case. unblock Jul 2024 #6

that's my thought about what they did /nt The Wandering Harper Jul 2024 #10

They're trying to disembowel it struggle4progress Jul 2024 #32