Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
5. My immediate association was with Socialist Realism of Stalin's Soviet Union, and that is a bad thing.
Thu Jul 11, 2024, 10:17 AM
Jul 2024

The clue is in the phrase "keep doing what we’ve been doing, but to start calling it progressive realism". What is being proposed here is to replace the name but nothing else. This underscores the superficiality of the proposal rather than an "offer of a better plan". Why change the branding when it doesn't come with a change of direction?

More ominously, the proposal implies making a distinction between "progressive realism" and all other types of realism. This, as history shows us, is a well known technique that had been used by populist regimes and movements to separate "desirable" realism from the "undesirable" (and, therefore, punishable) version of it.

If the idea was to emphasize pragmatism based on existing realities, "Realistic Progressivism", although awkward, would be a far better choice.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Progressive Realism - eme...»Reply #5