Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
71. Nothing I wrote comes remotely close. I am betting the photographs aren't lying
Wed Jul 17, 2024, 05:57 AM
Jul 2024

Your title is a low-down cheap trick that says everything about you and nothing about me.

You can assert whatever you want about me. In this case you have written fiction.

If you want respect around here, don't try that trick on others. It damages your reputation to try it and it doesn't work.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Now let's not go holding tRump to any regular standards here Blue Owl Jul 2024 #1
My guess is that Trump wasn't hit by a bullet, which is why LisaL Jul 2024 #2
Mine too. soldierant Jul 2024 #46
I agree. Prof. Toru Tanaka Jul 2024 #52
Trying to piece together what the press isn't saying canetoad Jul 2024 #66
No corporate reporters asking any questions at all BoRaGard Jul 2024 #78
PTSD...? Happens to victims, too. NM Grins Jul 2024 #3
Earlier today, my post on PTSD Dear_Prudence Jul 2024 #10
Our esteemed media has no curiosity at all....Imagine the calls if it were Joe spanone Jul 2024 #4
Yesh, No investigative qualities At All regarding Cha Jul 2024 #69
Looking at him tonight he has a very sad face Emile Jul 2024 #5
He's too unevolved to have actual human emotion. AZ8theist Jul 2024 #20
I think he's sad because the TV ratings are horrible for his convention. Emile Jul 2024 #70
oh FUCK him Skittles Jul 2024 #27
I'm still thinking he was hit by debris rather than a bullet William Seger Jul 2024 #6
The graze... 2naSalit Jul 2024 #15
Are you suggesting that a bullet that would do no damage at all Ms. Toad Jul 2024 #50
How so? hardluck Jul 2024 #51
The exploding apple shots were centred on. This was a graze and the earlobe is flexible unlike apple cores. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #61
Trump got hit by debris, not shot Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #7
Not logical. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. . . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #9
We don't have any evidence to the contrary Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #11
Except that Trump is a liar. Pototan Jul 2024 #23
We are not taking tRump's word. The photographs show a bullet and a bullet wound. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #34
That NYT picture does not show a bullet striking Trump Pototan Jul 2024 #54
It is a motion streak. Air shock waves go off at a diagonal. It is 100% consisten with the video. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #56
Still could miss by feet Pototan Jul 2024 #58
What? You think you can catch tRump in a lie? That's it? Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #60
In 2004, the repukes Pototan Jul 2024 #62
Kerry is not tRump. You oblige tRump's desire to focus on the ear Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #64
You're Betting that Trump's not lying Pototan Jul 2024 #68
Nothing I wrote comes remotely close. I am betting the photographs aren't lying Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #71
What are you talking about? Pototan Jul 2024 #74
You wrote that I believe tRump. That is a slur that you should self-delete. . . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #76
Didn't you write this? Pototan Jul 2024 #80
Correct. I wrote "not taking tRump's word". And then you posted the slur that I supposedly was. Self-delete it. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #81
And then pointed to inconclusive evedince Pototan Jul 2024 #82
You just repeated the falsehood slur. Stop. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #83
I'll let you have the last word Pototan Jul 2024 #84
You get it. Politics is about perception more than facts. radius777 Jul 2024 #67
If people don't care that he raped E Jean Carroll Dorian Gray Jul 2024 #73
Why does it matter if it was debris or a bullet? Dorian Gray Jul 2024 #72
It makes him a liar Pototan Jul 2024 #75
But everyone knows he's a liar Dorian Gray Jul 2024 #87
But to lie in this case Pototan Jul 2024 #88
I really don't think his voters Dorian Gray Jul 2024 #90
We are never going to get "his voters" Pototan Jul 2024 #92
But he was actually shot at Dorian Gray Jul 2024 #93
"from THE shattered teleprompter" -- No teleprompter was shattered. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #8
It need have nothing to do with a teleprompter Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #12
No. I am saying that no teleprompter was shattered. It is fiction to write "the shattered teleprompter" Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #17
I agree that there was no damage to the teleprompter Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #18
We have lots of evidence he was shot by a bullet Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #21
1, 2, and 4 are conjecture. 3 is not probative Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #24
1, 2, and 4 are photographic evidence. Not conjecture. The absence of records leads only to conjecture. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #30
The conjecture is about what these photos show Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #33
Stop asking me about the records! It's not my legal right to release them !!!! That conjecture is all you got. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #35
The Trump campaign should release medical records confirming gunshot wound Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #37
Even you can figure out I am not the tRump campaign! . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #38
Sure Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #39
Isn't it odd that those here at DU Pototan Jul 2024 #59
3 or 4 officers within feet of Trump had minor injuries Pototan Jul 2024 #25
Do we know who treated him? Sanity Claws Jul 2024 #13
Docs can only share what patient allows SomedayKindaLove Jul 2024 #14
but the press ISN'T EVEN ASKING Skittles Jul 2024 #48
I am a nurse. If a bullet from AR-15 had pierced his ear... Murphyb849 Jul 2024 #16
No. The ear is peripheral and the nick is peripheral to the ear. It is not like a core of an apple exploding Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #26
The wound is 100% consistent Zeitghost Jul 2024 #32
Best response. colorado_ufo Jul 2024 #42
This is simply not true at all.... Melon Jul 2024 #65
I think I've been posting this same question here Pototan Jul 2024 #19
The oddest was the poster who spent literally years debunking 9/11 truther nonsense Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #22
Every effort should be made to find the rounds buried in the ground. John1956PA Jul 2024 #31
Yes, I understand that crime scene analysis poses many challenges Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #36
Yes they can Zeitghost Jul 2024 #41
There are going to be inquiries and investigations Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #45
Sure, they should look for any and all evidence Zeitghost Jul 2024 #47
Maybe it will be a memento for an enterprising Ag Science student who happens across it Prairie Gates Jul 2024 #49
The bullet Zeitghost Jul 2024 #40
seeing DUers ask how it matters Skittles Jul 2024 #29
Many of us have been asking the same question. I have never seen doc03 Jul 2024 #28
When Zeitghost Jul 2024 #44
Don't forget it wasn't just TSF that was (shot?) there were other people. There are doc03 Jul 2024 #79
I'm very skeptical of what happened, specifically on how there appeared to be little damage to his ear tornado34jh Jul 2024 #43
Conduct a thought experiment millimetre by millimetre. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2024 #55
I see. Still, while I understand the HIPPA laws, with such a high profile person tornado34jh Jul 2024 #89
It's (In My Mind, OK), Almost a Certainty That No Bullet Contacted the Dear Savior's Ear The Roux Comes First Jul 2024 #53
The round used was reportedly 5.56mm. yagotme Jul 2024 #86
TFG is low information RANDYWILDMAN Jul 2024 #57
I'm so completely and utterly disappointed in *some members* of the news media ecstatic Jul 2024 #63
Something is fishy BoRaGard Jul 2024 #77
I still believe that the only way to settle this once and for all Buns_of_Fire Jul 2024 #85
But we are told by many here that cheato doesn't have to answer senseandsensibility Jul 2024 #91
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Michael Steele: You would...»Reply #71