Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(22,143 posts)

2. We've had the Senate since 2007.

Sun Dec 2, 2012, 10:49 PM

Dec 2012

How many of Obama's judges still haven't been given a vote?

If we don't change the rules, nothing will be different than it has been.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can Republicans filibuster judicial nominees? RickFromMN Dec 2012 #1

not if the filibuster rules change still_one Dec 2012 #3

We've had the Senate since 2007. MrSlayer Dec 2012 #2

Here's a LIST Tx4obama Dec 2012 #4

That's my point. MrSlayer Dec 2012 #6

Well then changing rules is the only way to go. MrSlayer Dec 2012 #9

This is why we need Senate Rules reform... TheProgressive Dec 2012 #5

"we will be control"? ashling Dec 2012 #7

IT is if the 60 vote rule stays in place. nt bluestate10 Dec 2012 #10