Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Five Facts About America's Pathological Wealth Distribution [View all]
Published on Monday, December 3, 2012 by Common Dreams
Five Facts About America's Pathological Wealth Distribution
by Paul Buchheit
Most people associate inequality with the income gap. As distorted as the distribution of income may be, our wealth distribution is even more extreme. Americans are beginning to realize that years of preferential tax treatment for the rich, under the guise of "supply-side job creation" nonsense, have bloated the fortunes of the super-rich to a level that would make Rockefeller and Carnegie envious.
1. We're close to being the most unequal country in the world.
Among countries with at least a quarter-million adults, only Russia, Ukraine, and Lebanon are more unequal, according to the most recent figures from Credit Suisse Research.
An earlier report by the same research team had indicated that Denmark and Switzerland were more unequal than the United States. While Switzerland is still high in the new data listing, ranking 18th, Denmark is actually rather equal relative to other countries, and received its dubious earlier position due to its own accurate reporting of household debt, as will be noted in Fact 5 below.
2. Wealth accumulation has been rigged for the rich.
The richest quintile of Americans owns 93% of non-home wealth. For Americans with incomes over $10 million, nearly half of their income comes from capital gains and dividends, on most of which they pay only a 15% tax. From 2002 to 2007, two-thirds of all income went to the richest 1%. Then, in the first year after the recession, a startling 93% of all new income went to the richest 1%. .........................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/12/03
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So we should be happy with feudalism, just as long as the feudal lord shares our nationality?
marmar
Dec 2012
#4
Are you trying to pretend that the rich have paid over 93% of all taxes paid since
Vincardog
Dec 2012
#34
I don't find "what about the Chinese?" arguments to be that much more compelling...
Major Nikon
Dec 2012
#14
It's simply a race to the bottom which ultimately benefits neither the rich or poor
Major Nikon
Dec 2012
#13
Corporate profits are at record highs while wages continue to fall relative to inflation.
byeya
Dec 2012
#20
I don't think that last line about creating a category for the magical accumulation of wealth
brewens
Dec 2012
#25
"The comfort of the rich depends upon an abundant supply of the poor." Voltaire
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2012
#39