General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Top EU official tells Julian Assange: 'Just go to Sweden and answer the questions' [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)(and others btw) have explained to you that the Prosecutor LIED about how the Swedish Court operates. We know that they must interview anyone alleged to have committed a crime. They have done this with no problem in the past, they have gone to other EU countries to do so because the EU facilitates how the Swedish Court operates.
The Swedish Prosecutor, and you know this, so I do not know why you are claiming you do not, has refused to do her duty and interview Assange, she refused while he was in Sweden, he was told he could leave. He went voluntarily to the Swedish Police and was interviewed in Sweden but not arrested. Why did the Swedish Police not arrest him?
Why has the Swedish Prosecutor lied about how the Swedish Courts operate and then when caught in the lie, refused to explain why she lied?
And why have you forgotten all these facts once again?
You jumped from claiming there were charges, to the next false allegation all of which has been gone over again and again with you.
So now that we have cleared that up, why has the Swedish Prosecutor not operated in THIS case as they have, legally, in other cases?
To be clear. There is no legal impediment to the Swedish Prosecutor to act as they always have in the past, in this case. They lied about that, they are still refusing to do their job and conduct that interview. The question is why??