Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
35. by the "state apparatus". what is the state apparatus of the hutterites? for that matter,
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 03:38 AM
Dec 2012

what is the "means of production" of the hutterites?

as i understood, their "means of production" are/were personal handtools & other tools that one might find, say, in a artisanal sawmill.

actually, i understood it, the hutterites stand against states of all kinds.

the "state socialism" which you say can't work has actually 'worked' on a large scale all through history, including in the us. state-run industries in modern times have included:

Electric/gas/water utilities both local and national (e.g. TVA)
Railroads, subways, buses, airlines, highways
Auto industryPpostal services
Banks
Telephone, telegraph, radio, TV
Oil
Ports
Mining (Coal & other minerals)
Suez Canal
Steel & other heavy industries
Pubs and breweries
Shipbuilding
Sugar production

In fact, important industries are regularly nationalized or quasi-nationalized after the capitalists have either looted them or run them into the ground -- thus the nationalization option is a *necessity* under capitalism -- to make it 'work'.

And in the case of some sectors, utilities being one, the evidence is pretty solid that state socialism produces better & more efficient service, more comprehensive service, less corruption & equal innovation.

and as for the soviet union/china, i'm not sure what your definition of 'work' is. any power which manages to feed all its people (as both did after famines early in their history, unprecedented in their respective histories), bring peasant societies into the industrial age, and give the great powers a run for their money for 74 years 'worked' in my book.

Haiti is capitalist. Does it 'work'? Congo is capitalist. Does it 'work'? Most of the world is capitalist, and most of the world's population is poor and insecure. Does capitalism 'work'? And for who?

and ps: the US government currently owns the majority share of GM, so in that sense, the government *is* making your car. And governments *have* made people's cars in capitalist europe, and -- amazing -- those cars worked -- just as well, say, as those government-made rockets that went into space did.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

k&r nt steve2470 Dec 2012 #1
I get weird looks when people find out I belong to the ACLU. Always a WTF moment for me. Like RKP5637 Dec 2012 #2
Side effect of us slipping into the dark ages Hydra Dec 2012 #7
Yep, I often think back about the same, and here they are, making it just just like "them" they RKP5637 Dec 2012 #21
Kick to find it later n/t hootinholler Dec 2012 #3
Believe it or not, in this day and age, Xipe Totec Dec 2012 #4
Du rec. Nt xchrom Dec 2012 #5
Unfortunately, many Americans think with their emotions and those emotions are 70 percent erroneous. BlueJazz Dec 2012 #6
100% spot on. DireStrike Dec 2012 #8
Oh, this rings a bell. nt msanthrope Dec 2012 #9
K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2012 #10
I went through my grandfather's drawers and found out he was a member of the Socialist Party -LOL LeftInTX Dec 2012 #11
They Really Believe they are the Majority.. redstatebluegirl Dec 2012 #12
You think that is bad. SkyIsGrey Dec 2012 #13
Five years ago I was having a discussion at Thanksgiving with my family on how I thought Cleita Dec 2012 #14
No wonder some people hate holiday gatherings. n/t cherokeeprogressive Dec 2012 #41
Went through four years of college in a so called Christian school being called a socialist. I jwirr Dec 2012 #15
Everyone in the MILITARY, using the taxpayer subsidized PX and TRICARE are SOCIALISTS! nt TheBlackAdder Dec 2012 #16
America As A Whole, And 1ProudAtheist Dec 2012 #17
It's worse than you say. I did look for the proper definitions in Google, and those bastards jtuck004 Dec 2012 #24
Great article. silverweb Dec 2012 #18
State socialism (Communism) can only work small scale of no more than 150 people ErikJ Dec 2012 #19
Do you have any evidence to support that claim? white_wolf Dec 2012 #22
Hutterites, Dunbar's Number =150 ErikJ Dec 2012 #23
what do hutterites have to do with "state socialism"? HiPointDem Dec 2012 #27
I think he is making the mistake that for "state socialism" to work it would be based on altruism. white_wolf Dec 2012 #28
true. but my point was 'what is the "state" part of hutterites'? HiPointDem Dec 2012 #29
They are small "communist" group and their max size is 150 ErikJ Dec 2012 #30
what is the 'state' in their 'state socialism'? HiPointDem Dec 2012 #31
I was referring to pure definition ErikJ Dec 2012 #34
by the "state apparatus". what is the state apparatus of the hutterites? for that matter, HiPointDem Dec 2012 #35
The author claims that isnt socialism ErikJ Dec 2012 #38
That is state ownership and management of the means of production. The author HiPointDem Dec 2012 #39
On the third link there is an interesting rightwing/liberal comparison: loudsue Dec 2012 #40
People think my sweater is an awkward moment. RUMMYisFROSTED Dec 2012 #20
I read the article. I wish the author's friend had a blog, sounds like it would be instructive. jtuck004 Dec 2012 #25
If you can, catch the old movie "Son of Kong" 1933. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2012 #26
lol. the sailors didn't know how to run the ship once the captains disappeared. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #32
I just tell people I'm a Socialist, a Liberal and a Progressive, and then talk right through... Systematic Chaos Dec 2012 #33
I had a kid in my class tell me socialism means you have to give your shirt away-- Starry Messenger Dec 2012 #36
Christianity: "And from him who takes away your coat, do not withhold your shirt either." HiPointDem Dec 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»That Incredibly Awkward M...»Reply #35