General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A bit about "potential rapists". [View all]Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)However even if you are(and I'm not convinced you are), I think you're missing a few important pieces of this. There are lots of women (and men) out there who are indeed victims of sexual assault of one type or another. Put yourself in their position for a moment and then tell me if you would still feel the same. If the answer is yes, I would suggest that your ability to put yourself in the shoes of someone else is possibly lacking. I can't even imagine what a victim of rape would feel, but I'm pretty sure it would be something they are going to carry around with them for the rest of their life. We don't let the victims of a crime sit on the jury which judges the accused, so there is something behind the idea of not allowing people who have very strong emotional interest dictate policy. However, I just don't think you can completely ignore their POV either, just because you have labeled it irrational.
The other piece is that while the actual risk may be lower than some would suggest, the impact is incredibly high. The way I look at risk is to look at both the probability and the impact. If I consider an activity that has a 1% chance of killing me, I'm probably going to avoid that activity because even while the risk may be low, the consequences are quite high. The example you give of murder just doesn't work too well because the incidence of murder is considerably lower than the incidence of rape, and this is particularly true of women.
I don't really see this as teaching women to be irrational. I see this as a reflection of what a lot of women feel, and whether or not you agree with that, you should still be able to find value in that POV or at the very least respect it.