Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dsc

(53,350 posts)
17. The following VPs have become President since 1900
Sat Aug 3, 2024, 12:51 PM
Aug 2024

Teddy Roosevelt (McKinley assassinated)
Calvin Coolidge (Harding died in office)
Harry Truman (FDR died in office)
Lyndon Johnson (Kennedy died in office)
Richard Nixon (ran in 68 after serving as VP from 53 to 61)
Gerald Ford (Nixon resigned)
George HW Bush (ran in 88 while serving as VP from 81 to 89)
Joe Biden (ran in 20 after serving as VP from 09 to 17)

In addition the following were nominees but lost
Richard Nixon (ran in 60 while serving as VP from 53 to 61)
Hubert Humphrey (ran in 68 while serving as VP from 65 to 69)
Walter Mondale (ran in 84 after serving as VP from 77 to 81)
Al Gore (ran in 00 while serving as VP from 93 to 01)
Kamala Harris (running now while serving from 21 to 25)

There have been 25 VP in that time frame. That is about a 1/3 chance of becoming President (slightly less if Harris loses, slightly more if Harris wins) and a nearly 1/2 chance of becoming a nominee. It is quite reasonable to think a VP has a pretty decent chance of becoming President someday and very reasonable to think they will become a nominee someday.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That is only a recent trend, not a historical one... getagrip_already Aug 2024 #1
Dan Quayle wasn't nominated in 2000 jg10003 Aug 2024 #2
There is also the tendency to want to avoid a bruising primary. NH Ethylene Aug 2024 #3
We overdo the bruising primary thing MadameButterfly Aug 2024 #9
I don't think that is true... Demsrule86 Aug 2024 #14
I'm not sure what you are saying isn't true MadameButterfly Aug 2024 #19
KR for this important conversation because, in the end, age does matter. CoopersDad Aug 2024 #4
Yes, I think you are correct pinkstarburst Aug 2024 #8
Her VP should be someone we will LOVE to become her successor, absolutely. CoopersDad Aug 2024 #10
Sitting V.Ps do not win elections. The only exception was Bush Sr. because too many question everything Aug 2024 #5
Yes, that's a big reason I feel very strongly about the decision. Sky Jewels Aug 2024 #6
Yes, this is why I feel so strongly about it pinkstarburst Aug 2024 #7
I suggest you consider that we may not have an election in 2032 if Trump wins. And we can't win without Demsrule86 Aug 2024 #13
I feel we have an amazingly deep bench MadameButterfly Aug 2024 #16
WE will lose without PA...and may not even have elections again. This is not a regular year. Demsrule86 Aug 2024 #15
Nope wrong...other than Bush I that never happens. The reason is simple we can't win without Pennsylvania. Demsrule86 Aug 2024 #11
People are always passionate about VP choices JI7 Aug 2024 #12
The following VPs have become President since 1900 dsc Aug 2024 #17
Who runs in 2028 is not a big concern for me today. FemDemERA Aug 2024 #18
Why is negative attention focused on one candidate? Bad Thoughts Aug 2024 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One reason I think there ...»Reply #17