General Discussion

KoKo

(84,711 posts)

16. It was based on Heritage Foundation's Recommendations though...as was Romney Care

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 10:10 AM

Dec 2012

from which it was also based.

Perhaps it was the best Obama could get but the transition is going to be bumpy. Lot's of folks will still be denied care under this no matter how many more will finally be able to obtain care who couldn't before. It's a messy mixed bag which does favor Pharma.

Needs much modification. I support Medicare for all though. Maybe we will get there eventually.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obamacare architect leaves White House for pharmaceutical industry job [View all] dkf Dec 2012 OP

Good riddance baucus, it is people like you who have helped reduce the Democratic party to one that still_one Dec 2012 #1

K&R I'm shocked! Egalitarian Thug Dec 2012 #2

+1 million... awoke_in_2003 Dec 2012 #24

OMG, yes you do. It seems to become more relevant with each passing year. n/t Egalitarian Thug Dec 2012 #26

In partial payment for services rendered to the industry while on the taxpayer payroll. jsr Dec 2012 #3

Why am I not surprised. Whovian Dec 2012 #4

Greenwald. LOL...nt SidDithers Dec 2012 #5

I refer you to post #2 hobbit709 Dec 2012 #6

It is not news that insurance lobby drafted the health plan. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #7

What a stupid argument ProSense Dec 2012 #8

stupid, and well-known OKNancy Dec 2012 #11

We have so many homeless people. Why not require people to buy more houses? AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #12

Are you really ProSense Dec 2012 #15

It was based on Heritage Foundation's Recommendations though...as was Romney Care KoKo Dec 2012 #16

No ProSense Dec 2012 #17

i doubt theres much you can say iamthebandfanman Dec 2012 #18

This was passed by Democrats so you can't really blame the Republicans. dkf Dec 2012 #19

Blame? ProSense Dec 2012 #21

There are ProSense Dec 2012 #20

Need some proof to back up that statement, please. enlightenment Dec 2012 #30

Here: ProSense Dec 2012 #33

If the focus truly was to "make it affordable," 1) no steps would have been taken to make it illegal AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #34

It's Greenwald. Would you expect anything different?...nt SidDithers Dec 2012 #22

good ol' Glen.... vaht? dionysus Dec 2012 #28

So you see no problem with Ms. Fowler going to work for big pharma? nm rhett o rick Dec 2012 #42

K&R a2liberal Dec 2012 #9

+1 LWolf Dec 2012 #13

+2 Myrina Dec 2012 #23

+3 AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #40

This is not a payoff. It's a reward for good work. Octafish Dec 2012 #10

Figures this asswipe would go to big pharma. He knows where the dough is. lonestarnot Dec 2012 #14

What was PO's rule on the swinging door when he first arrived in the Administration? ReRe Dec 2012 #25

They can do whatever ProSense Dec 2012 #27

Ahhhhh...... ReRe Dec 2012 #31

And even if they could keep track of that, still plenty of ways they can work the swinging door. eomer Dec 2012 #39

Kind of sounds like lobbyists.... ReRe Dec 2012 #41

Is the ban being enforced? Has anyone been prosecuted? nm rhett o rick Dec 2012 #43

What a surprise! *not* Cleita Dec 2012 #29

There needs to be laws against this. mountain grammy Dec 2012 #32

She done good, according to the industry, and is now being rewarded...nt joeybee12 Dec 2012 #35

The super rich are rather fond of servants who have proved their loyalty. jsr Dec 2012 #36

So very incestuous Hydra Dec 2012 #37

The ACA has done some good. But, in reality, it is fundamentally inadequate for Zorra Dec 2012 #38

Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #44

Oh so you like the fact that this Former WellPoint exec practically wrote the danged thing? dkf Dec 2012 #45