Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why didn't Ukraine invade Russia a long time ago? nt [View all]yagotme
(4,135 posts)14. Hard to not "take things personally", when those things ARE addressed to you personally. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Right. Until someone puts forth an opposing view, then the name calling comes out. nt
yagotme
Aug 2024
#9
Hard to not "take things personally", when those things ARE addressed to you personally. nt
yagotme
Aug 2024
#14
You didn't start with an "opposing view" You started with a challenge without substance.
Stinky The Clown
Aug 2024
#36
Yes, exactly. By illustrating just how weak and unprepared Russia is right now,
MineralMan
Aug 2024
#37
edited prior post. As far as truly 'informed' opinion, you (and they) are probably correct.
stopdiggin
Aug 2024
#32
Not using NATO weapons on Russian territories has been the condition for getting them
Beastly Boy
Aug 2024
#13
Because the US pressured them NOT to (initiallly being very concerned of wider conflict)...
hlthe2b
Aug 2024
#22
In the begining the expectation was that the amassed 100,000 Russian troops of the vaunted Red Army would.....
EarnestPutz
Aug 2024
#29
Partly because they were pressured by the U.S. and Russia to give up their nukes in the 1990s
Wicked Blue
Aug 2024
#54