Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jody

(26,624 posts)
50. Apparently few have read the Sedition Act so I post it below.
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 08:34 PM
Dec 2012
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/United_States_Statutes_at_Large/Volume_1/5th_Congress/2nd_Session/Chapter_74

Known as the "Sedition Act", this act is the last of the four that make up the Alien and Sedition Acts.

July 14, 1798.
[Expired.]
Chap. LXXIV.—An Act in addition to the act, entitled "An act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States."

Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, Penalty on unlawful combinations to oppose the measures of government, &c.
Ante, p. 112.That if any persons shall unlawfully combine or conspire together, with intent to oppose any measure or measures of the government of the United States, which are or shall be directed by proper authority, or to impede the operation of any law of the United States, or to intimidate or prevent any person holding a place or office in or under the government of the United States, from undertaking, performing or executing his trust or duty; And with such intent counselling &c. insurrections, riots, &c.and if any person or persons, with intent as aforesaid, shall counsel, advise or attempt to procure any insurrection, riot, unlawful assembly, or combination, whether such conspiracy, threatening, counsel, advice, or attempt shall have the proposed effect or not, he or they shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanor, and on conviction, before any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof; shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars, and by imprisonment during a term not less than six months nor exceeding five years; and further, at the discretion of the court may be holden to find sureties for his good behaviour in such sum, and for such time, as the said court may direct.

Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, Penalty on libelling the government That if any person shall write, print, utter or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed, uttered or published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States, or either house of the Congress of the United States, or the President of the United States, with intent to defame the said government, or either house of the said Congress, or the said President, or to bring them, or either of them, into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them, or either or any of them, the hatred of the good people of the United States, or to stir up sedition within the United States, or to excite any unlawful combinations therein, for opposing or resisting any law of the United States, or any act of the President of the United States, done in pursuance of any such law, or of the powers in him vested by the constitution of the United States, or to resist, oppose, or defeat any such law or act, or to aid, encourage or abet any hostile designs of any foreign nation against the United States, their people or government, then such person, being thereof convicted before any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and by imprisonment not exceeding two years.

Sec. 3. And be it further enacted and declared, Truth of the matter may be given in evidence.
The jury shall determine the law and the fact, under the court's direction.
Limitation. That if any person shall be prosecuted under this act, for the writing or publishing any libel aforesaid, it shall be lawful for the defendant, upon the trial of the cause, to give in evidence in his defence, the truth of the matter contained in the publication charged as a libel. And the jury who shall try the cause, shall have a right to determine the law and the fact, under the direction of the court, as in other cases.

Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That this act shall continue and be in force until the third day of March, one thousand eight hundred and one, and no longer: Provided, that the expiration of the act shall not prevent or defeat a prosecution and punishment of any offence against the law, during the time it shall be in force.

Approved, July 14, 1798.
the problem is that fokkks is cable.... not broadcast oldhippydude Dec 2012 #1
Then isn't it time we GAVE the FCC jurisdiction? Occulus Dec 2012 #10
If we did that... actslikeacarrot Dec 2012 #14
The problem with that mentality is that Occulus Dec 2012 #16
The courts have held that cable has first amendment rights closer to those of newspapers than onenote Dec 2012 #43
As long as you're prepared for a Republican FCC to do the same thing to MSNBC or Current... brooklynite Dec 2012 #77
I don't care if it's cable, sat or rabbit ears.. a lie is a lie, slander is slander n/m Rosco T. Dec 2012 #23
Fox Radio, isn't that part of the FCC? LeftInTX Dec 2012 #39
I get them delivered through the air at my house. Dish TV. Vincardog Dec 2012 #51
Imagine what society would be like if we replaced all RW media with educational programming instead JaneyVee Dec 2012 #2
Imagine what society would be like if the Constitution allowed the government to make those onenote Dec 2012 #44
In contrast to FoX Propaganda Channel pbrower2a Dec 2012 #83
I haven't watched Fox News in about 10 years. I suggest you do the same. virgogal Dec 2012 #3
Consider this choir member preached. Occulus Dec 2012 #11
Normally I agree, but AlreadyDoneThat Dec 2012 #53
Welcome to DU! hrmjustin Dec 2012 #57
Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwnnnn......... Iggy Dec 2012 #4
One election is not proof of any final and irrevocable undoing of Occulus Dec 2012 #13
Agreed, However Iggy Dec 2012 #33
Preaching to the choir is a good analogy, but AlreadyDoneThat Dec 2012 #54
Fox News has been propagandizing for 30 years? onenote Dec 2012 #45
You, too. Occulus Dec 2012 #60
Do You Actually Look At Their Ratings? ProfessorGAC Dec 2012 #55
I said "and its ilk" Occulus Dec 2012 #59
Oh yeah? rainin Dec 2012 #80
Good idea. We could reinstate the Sedition Act from 1798 so government can jody Dec 2012 #5
Are you defending Foxnews? hrmjustin Dec 2012 #9
They are not on the air ... oldhippie Dec 2012 #18
I mean like complaints and boycotts. Sorry for not being clearer. hrmjustin Dec 2012 #19
Actually jody is defending freedom AlexSatan Dec 2012 #36
Point taken! hrmjustin Dec 2012 #40
The Sedition Act has fuck-all to do with the OP Occulus Dec 2012 #15
Please read the Sedition Act. OP has every thing to do with it because the OP wants to punish jody Dec 2012 #42
results of jury service naaman fletcher Dec 2012 #47
Recently a post said of me "You are a disgusting, sick person." I alerted and jody Dec 2012 #49
If you are wishing for legislation like Canada and the UK former9thward Dec 2012 #6
untrue Rosco T. Dec 2012 #25
Nope. former9thward Dec 2012 #35
yes samsingh Dec 2012 #7
My repuke friends support "the rules" socialindependocrat Dec 2012 #8
Make them put up a truth ticker. sarcasmo Dec 2012 #12
Yes, news as a vehicle to keep the populace informed Cleita Dec 2012 #17
I have daydreamed trying to organize 20M people to each buy $50 stock & then proxy votes Turn CO Blue Dec 2012 #20
That is how to do it AlexSatan Dec 2012 #37
We must collectively work very hard mick063 Dec 2012 #21
I agree. Cable or no, it's a different animal when they are causing the whole country to have loudsue Dec 2012 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Jonny Dec 2012 #24
Hair Splitting Jonny Dec 2012 #26
So you would have been okay with Nixon's prosecution of the New York Times onenote Dec 2012 #46
As I now ONLY watch Rev. Al Sharpton on MSNBC and none of the others... graham4anything Dec 2012 #27
Media Matters points the lies out at least ErikJ Dec 2012 #28
Opinions Are One Thing, Facts Another colsohlibgal Dec 2012 #29
splendid idea jeanlibny594283 Dec 2012 #30
Canada FAUX is an "Entertainment Network" IF ya' ACT like clowns, it's just truth in advertising. Tigress DEM Dec 2012 #31
Once a person learns what propaganda is they stop watching MSMedia... just1voice Dec 2012 #32
They're Already Starting To Take Themselves Down...and the Rushpublicans with them... KharmaTrain Dec 2012 #34
If you see them on in a doctor's or dentist's office, complain to the staff LeftInTX Dec 2012 #38
Something similar would fill the void. Apparently there is a market for their point of view. Throd Dec 2012 #41
If I say what I want to say, I probably be alerted Great Caesars Ghost Dec 2012 #48
Apparently few have read the Sedition Act so I post it below. jody Dec 2012 #50
So, they were against it and so are you against charges of (libel) sedition, I'm guessing. freshwest Dec 2012 #82
I support nullification as Jefferson and Madison defined it in their KY & VA resolutions. nt jody Dec 2012 #85
As far as states' rights go, that interpretation has been abused to deny human rights.. freshwest Dec 2012 #86
This is how we do it. We put a law in place like Canada has. Cleita Dec 2012 #52
Sun News has been available in Canada since April 2011 onenote Dec 2012 #62
Perhaps, but because the other stations must mind regulations according to their license, it keeps Cleita Dec 2012 #63
The Wikipedia entry you cite confirms everything I wrote onenote Dec 2012 #65
If you think you are right then you think you are right. Cleita Dec 2012 #67
Here's an example of how Sun News doesn't seem to be restrained by Canadian law onenote Dec 2012 #68
Yes, but the fact is they aren't taken seriously because they aren't dominating the whole Cleita Dec 2012 #69
Fox News isn't remotely the dominant news source for the entire country. onenote Dec 2012 #71
If you believe that you aren't paying attention. Cleita Dec 2012 #72
You need to get out more onenote Dec 2012 #73
Ann Coulter as despicable as she is much smarter than Jonah Goldberg, Cleita Dec 2012 #74
btw I looked up your link. Cleita Dec 2012 #75
Do you think you can get away with just making stuff up? onenote Dec 2012 #78
I'm not the person making stuff up here and although I do respect the Pew Center, Cleita Dec 2012 #79
You really are something else. onenote Dec 2012 #84
The best way to take down Faux, I believe AlreadyDoneThat Dec 2012 #56
a decade overdue upi402 Dec 2012 #58
Fox is only more blatant than the others KurtNYC Dec 2012 #61
I heard a commercial on the radio that Fox News is the only radio news station in SW Florida. Michigan Alum Dec 2012 #64
I would like to see this happen but the only way we can do it is through their advertisers like jwirr Dec 2012 #66
Yep. The best way is to underthematrix Dec 2012 #76
what is an example of something they have said or done in the past that you believe arely staircase Dec 2012 #70
I haven't even owned a TV in a decade. brokechris Dec 2012 #81
Makes Me Sad When I See The Shortsightedness Of This NeedleCast Dec 2012 #87
I am pro-choice on this issue. I don't like Fox, so I choose not to watch it. Nye Bevan Dec 2012 #88
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Isn't it time we took dow...»Reply #50