Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Stupid - "Administration Weighs Legal Action Against States That Legalized Marijuana Use" [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)25. You are thinking that way, they are not
They still think the war on drugs is worth pursuing. And thousands (on both sides) have made millions at a personal level. They are not thinking electoral politics the way you are either, but law and order.
I mean, the way local DEA speaks every time we have a bust, the moment it's rescheduled they will have a crisis, a career crisis. Anybody smoking or growing is a violent criminal (and some of the growers are). This s what you are dealing with. Congress will not go there either, law and order and all that.
I am not saying I agree, just trying to explain the dynamic.
(In fact, I said this war was a complete failure back in the early 1990s)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Stupid - "Administration Weighs Legal Action Against States That Legalized Marijuana Use" [View all]
grahamhgreen
Dec 2012
OP
I agree. If Obama goes through with fighting Colorado and Washington, that will be
bluestate10
Dec 2012
#29
For God's sake, the Admin failed to prosecute torture, Bush crimes and Banksters.
grahamhgreen
Dec 2012
#23
Obama can leash the DEA and have them just focus on state borders and work with states that
bluestate10
Dec 2012
#30
I would think that they could all get together and discuss this ....
socialindependocrat
Dec 2012
#2
Exactly. And this group of voters is highly motivated, dedicated, and effective advocates
grahamhgreen
Dec 2012
#4
Those were not the only presidents to do so . Check out George Washington, et al.
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2012
#7
Stupid? I don't agree. We've been told that Obama is very smart. And he is.
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2012
#5
The surprise is that a move against decrim could cost us multiple elections,
grahamhgreen
Dec 2012
#11
That is one reason why I can't believe that the White House is that fucking blind.
bluestate10
Dec 2012
#28
It is absoulutely anti-democratic. The people have spoken, now he should support democracy; or
grahamhgreen
Dec 2012
#36