General Discussion

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)

2. Why is the second one less important than the first?

Fri Dec 7, 2012, 09:22 PM

Dec 2012

It can easily be argued that this vindicates his approach to governing and is therefore more important than the first.

Besides, think of all the money being pumped into the local economy.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I�m not the brightest bulb in the tree, so please guys help me with this..... [View all] busterbrown Dec 2012 OP

Because we cherish and celebrate our democratic process underpants Dec 2012 #1

Sometimes it really is just that simple. (nt) Posteritatis Dec 2012 #42

Yes, right now under the circumstances our country needs this madokie Dec 2012 #57

Why is the second one less important than the first? Motown_Johnny Dec 2012 #2

I'm looking forward to celebrate Obama's win. warrior1 Dec 2012 #3

I think maybe at least 50% of the reason is the people who worked their butts off patrice Dec 2012 #4

An 'after' party. Yeah. randome Dec 2012 #10

It's a good thing too. Helps people become persons to one another, not just functionaries. nt patrice Dec 2012 #13

+1000 The party is for the volunteers. alittlelark Dec 2012 #44

AND it's good for them to party in recognition of the work that they did. patrice Dec 2012 #49

NO, it isn't tasteless, it is tradition. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2012 #5

No we won and we deserve our party upaloopa Dec 2012 #6

anything that pisses off Republicans cant be all bad...n/t oldhippydude Dec 2012 #8

Because when we get to say "Ha Ha" on this scale, we want to do it in an elegant way. Squinch Dec 2012 #7

He deserves to celebrate, and I'll be celebrating with him. MineralMan Dec 2012 #9

You didn't bring up the extravagant trips and wardrobe that his wife and.... Walk away Dec 2012 #11

Oh, you�re a sharp one aren�t you? n/t busterbrown Dec 2012 #12

WHY shouldn't Obama have a second one? Every other president has, is he less deserving? IMO this Raine Dec 2012 #14

It was a valid point, at any rate. randome Dec 2012 #15

I�m surprised! Most see it that way. busterbrown Dec 2012 #18

No one stated he shouldn�t have one! busterbrown Dec 2012 #17

Tasteless extravaganza? madamesilverspurs Dec 2012 #16

VERY well said, my dear madaesilverspurs! CaliforniaPeggy Dec 2012 #39

I see what you mean. But it is an historic election. Even in bad times, celebrations are good. Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #19

True it's a form of government spending treestar Dec 2012 #26

It's privately funded by wealthy. Not by govt. So it's directing wealthy funds to being spent. nt Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #55

that's stimulating too though treestar Dec 2012 #61

Yes, I think so too. nt Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #62

Maybe Roberts won't muff it this time BiminiTwisted Dec 2012 #20

Trash me now if you wish, but I would like to see Obama set a precedent of not spending Tennessee Gal Dec 2012 #21

Wouldn�t be surprised if they made a downsizing announcement. busterbrown Dec 2012 #24

I did not think you were trying to minimize the Obama victory. Perhaps the best Tennessee Gal Dec 2012 #31

Exactly...I�m surprised that my original post received so many negatives..... busterbrown Dec 2012 #45

Did Bush scale it back during 2 wars??? JoePhilly Dec 2012 #22

Obama should scale back simply because he is a better man than W. nt Tennessee Gal Dec 2012 #23

Making a comparison between the two is ridiculous! One is an asshole the other is a compassionate busterbrown Dec 2012 #27

Because it is a new election treestar Dec 2012 #25

Oh do tell us what else is too nice for the likes of him. Care Acutely Dec 2012 #28

thats helpful. Take the discussion to dumb extremes. busterbrown Dec 2012 #33

Do tell. Ikonoklast Dec 2012 #50

Uh, no. Your OP did, buster. Tasteless?? DevonRex Dec 2012 #52

Why? To Give Fox News something to bitch about. discopants Dec 2012 #29

Thats exactly what Fox News is going to Bitch about.�Uncaring Obama Parties the night away�! busterbrown Dec 2012 #37

And if Obama downsized they'd sneer at him for that. The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2012 #48

The Inauguration sets the tone for what the administration Historic NY Dec 2012 #30

when is there a time when there is not 'with all that's going on' spanone Dec 2012 #32

It kinda turns my stomach too. Curmudgeoness Dec 2012 #34

have a great big sloppy party Mothdust Dec 2012 #35

republican noses Mothdust Dec 2012 #36

Not doing this kind of stuff is exactly what makes Obama so much better than them! busterbrown Dec 2012 #38

you're right, of course Mothdust Dec 2012 #54

Hopefuly the justices will practice their lines before hand this time. geckosfeet Dec 2012 #40

I hope Alito, Scalia and Thomas stay away. They�ll stink up the podium! busterbrown Dec 2012 #41

Well Roberts fucked up his line during the swearing in. geckosfeet Dec 2012 #43

Right! But he essentially gave us Obamacare and took a crock of shit for it from the right. busterbrown Dec 2012 #46

Good point. But he didn't give anything away. He was constrained by a literal geckosfeet Dec 2012 #58

There is nothing in the oath of office that limits it to 4 years FarCenter Dec 2012 #47

Take the money and use it to help take back the doc03 Dec 2012 #51

They should at least do something symbolic Canuckistanian Dec 2012 #53

The inauguration is because WE, THE PEOPLE want it lunatica Dec 2012 #56

The first one was so wonderfully done and fun to watch. narnian60 Dec 2012 #60

It is tasteless. n/t Hotler Dec 2012 #59

Agreed. nt Romulox Dec 2012 #63