Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Stupid - "Administration Weighs Legal Action Against States That Legalized Marijuana Use" [View all]socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)31. Actually I don't think it would be like that. If it's legal......
under STATE law, then the "traffic ticket" type of punishment wouldn't apply. If the state authorities won't arrest or prosecute (because they can't arrest or prosecute), then the only arresting or prosecuting would be done by federal authorities. In that case, whatever federal laws were broken and punishments for them would apply. Of course, then you could ask for a jury trial in the federal case and hope for a nullification.
Actually nullification would be the best way to handle it. I think that I would hang a jury that I was on involving marijuana.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Stupid - "Administration Weighs Legal Action Against States That Legalized Marijuana Use" [View all]
grahamhgreen
Dec 2012
OP
I agree. If Obama goes through with fighting Colorado and Washington, that will be
bluestate10
Dec 2012
#29
For God's sake, the Admin failed to prosecute torture, Bush crimes and Banksters.
grahamhgreen
Dec 2012
#23
Obama can leash the DEA and have them just focus on state borders and work with states that
bluestate10
Dec 2012
#30
I would think that they could all get together and discuss this ....
socialindependocrat
Dec 2012
#2
Exactly. And this group of voters is highly motivated, dedicated, and effective advocates
grahamhgreen
Dec 2012
#4
Those were not the only presidents to do so . Check out George Washington, et al.
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2012
#7
Stupid? I don't agree. We've been told that Obama is very smart. And he is.
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2012
#5
The surprise is that a move against decrim could cost us multiple elections,
grahamhgreen
Dec 2012
#11
That is one reason why I can't believe that the White House is that fucking blind.
bluestate10
Dec 2012
#28
It is absoulutely anti-democratic. The people have spoken, now he should support democracy; or
grahamhgreen
Dec 2012
#36