Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: PoliticsGirl: There's nothing in the Constitution that says SCOTUS is the final word on what's constitutional [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(175,354 posts)3. Chuck Schumer rolls out 'No Kings Act' to eliminate presidential immunity
Congress has the power to limit the jurisdiction of the SCOTUS and this act would reverse the SCOTUS ruling on presidential immunity and restrict the court's jurisdiction
Link to tweet
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/chuck-schumer-remove-presidential-immunity-trump-rcna164618
The legislation, dubbed the "No Kings Act," would ensure that neither sitting nor former presidents and vice presidents are entitled to immunity from prosecution for alleged crimes. The bill has more than two dozen Democratic signers.
If it is passed, the legislation would make it clear that Congress has the power to determine to whom federal criminal laws may be applied," not the Supreme Court, according to the bill's outline provided by Schumer's office.
In his statement explaining his reasoning for the legislation, Schumer called the Supreme Court's decision about Trump's immunity "disastrous," arguing that "the Supreme Court threw out centuries of precedent and anointed Trump and subsequent presidents as kings above the law."
Chief Justice John Roberts said in his majority opinion for the court that lower courts needed to determine through additional proceedings what Trump could face prosecution for.
If it is passed, the legislation would make it clear that Congress has the power to determine to whom federal criminal laws may be applied," not the Supreme Court, according to the bill's outline provided by Schumer's office.
In his statement explaining his reasoning for the legislation, Schumer called the Supreme Court's decision about Trump's immunity "disastrous," arguing that "the Supreme Court threw out centuries of precedent and anointed Trump and subsequent presidents as kings above the law."
Chief Justice John Roberts said in his majority opinion for the court that lower courts needed to determine through additional proceedings what Trump could face prosecution for.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
19 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
PoliticsGirl: There's nothing in the Constitution that says SCOTUS is the final word on what's constitutional [View all]
Dennis Donovan
Sep 2024
OP
If that actually would work Congress could way too easily violate our constitutional rights
RidinWithHarris
Sep 2024
#33
Not me. That power would only require 267 of those 535 to want to fuck us over
RidinWithHarris
Sep 2024
#36
Chuck Schumer rolls out 'No Kings Act' to eliminate presidential immunity
LetMyPeopleVote
Sep 2024
#3
Republicans will rush to embrace Shumer's No Kings (or Queens) Act after Kamala wins.
Marcuse
Sep 2024
#7
I'm not sure how old you are, but if you can recall back to the early-mid 60's
FakeNoose
Sep 2024
#28
This is what the criminal USSC6 fear most! They know they do not have the constitution on their side.
Clouds Passing
Sep 2024
#43
My opinion is that the Fourth covers a woman's right to control her own body, thus abortion is her choice.
mucholderthandirt
Sep 2024
#44