General Discussion

Clouds Passing

(7,088 posts)

43. This is what the criminal USSC6 fear most! They know they do not have the constitution on their side.

Reply to Dennis Donovan (Original post)

Thu Sep 19, 2024, 08:50 AM

Sep 2024

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

PoliticsGirl: There's nothing in the Constitution that says SCOTUS is the final word on what's constitutional [View all] Dennis Donovan Sep 2024 OP

Hey, Sam, grumpyduck Sep 2024 #1

Which Is Really The Point ProfessorGAC Sep 2024 #31

There is nothing in the Constitution that recognizes Delmette2.0 Sep 2024 #37

But if not the SCOTUS, who or what? RidinWithHarris Sep 2024 #2

Tough question. What do other countries do on the issue of constitutionality? tinrobot Sep 2024 #4

That's a really good question Nasruddin Sep 2024 #10

The congress and the states can change/amend the constitution to madinmaryland Sep 2024 #12

Apparently markodochartaigh Sep 2024 #13

If that actually would work Congress could way too easily violate our constitutional rights RidinWithHarris Sep 2024 #33

Personally I would rather have the power in markodochartaigh Sep 2024 #35

Not me. That power would only require 267 of those 535 to want to fuck us over RidinWithHarris Sep 2024 #36

Yeah, no. Mysterian Sep 2024 #34

Present system should work. Codifer Sep 2024 #29

Chuck Schumer rolls out 'No Kings Act' to eliminate presidential immunity LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2024 #3

Republicans will rush to embrace Shumer's No Kings (or Queens) Act after Kamala wins. Marcuse Sep 2024 #7

Z'at Guy Fawkes? Kid Berwyn Sep 2024 #17

It is King Charles I of England who quite literally wnylib Sep 2024 #24

Thank you! The English speaking peoples have such a complicated history. Kid Berwyn Sep 2024 #39

Meet King Charles I. He was subject to a previous No Kings act. Marcuse Sep 2024 #38

The royals really like to play up that appointed by the Creator stuff. Kid Berwyn Sep 2024 #40

All Believers believe the Bible Seinan Sensei Sep 2024 #42

Perhaps ReRe Sep 2024 #32

Yet SCOTUS will have the final say on that. keithbvadu2 Sep 2024 #5

How many divisions does the Supreme Court command? nt Shipwack Sep 2024 #9

After November - when Chump loses decisively - it won't be much of an issue FakeNoose Sep 2024 #14

Not a fan of this argument. Happy Hoosier Sep 2024 #6

At a minimum, and expanding the court is a great idea too. nt TBF Sep 2024 #8

I'd like to see a new regulation about the Presidential appointments FakeNoose Sep 2024 #30

That might leave the court with empty seats for a long period. erronis Sep 2024 #45

They've operated with less than full count before FakeNoose Sep 2024 #46

The emoluments clause is in the Constitution, but it's ignored. surfered Sep 2024 #11

Does the Constitution say that she BattleRow Sep 2024 #15

I've said this before moonshinegnomie Sep 2024 #16

Love this! Joinfortmill Sep 2024 #18

If members of SCOTUS are removed by "Official Act" as of now... 3825-87867 Sep 2024 #19

And again, the Constitution does NOT grant lifetime tenure 3825-87867 Sep 2024 #22

So relitigate Marbury. former9thward Sep 2024 #20

KnR! sarchasm Sep 2024 #21

Everytime Roberts... RANDYWILDMAN Sep 2024 #23

I've been saying this for years Farmer-Rick Sep 2024 #25

I'm not sure how old you are, but if you can recall back to the early-mid 60's FakeNoose Sep 2024 #28

Don't believe there is anything in the Constitution that says republianmushroom Sep 2024 #26

Statements like Alito's betray a fundamental misinterpretation... -misanthroptimist Sep 2024 #27

SC usurped the power to amend the Constitution V850i Sep 2024 #41

This is what the criminal USSC6 fear most! They know they do not have the constitution on their side. Clouds Passing Sep 2024 #43

My opinion is that the Fourth covers a woman's right to control her own body, thus abortion is her choice. mucholderthandirt Sep 2024 #44