Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

AverageOldGuy

(3,926 posts)
Sun Sep 22, 2024, 03:51 AM Sep 2024

This is Trump's plan . . . and it may work [View all]

The President can be elected in one of two ways:

ONE: We vote. Votes are tallied in each precinct, election officials in each precinct meet and certify results to State authorities. State authorities certify results to Electoral College in DC. Congress meets in joint session, Electoral College certifies results to Congress, Congress votes to accept Electoral College report, President is elected.

TWO: We vote. Votes are tallied in each precinct, election officials in each precinct meet and certify results to State authorities. State authorities DO NOT CERTIFY results to Electoral College in DC either by refusal or by not reporting by date certain. Congress meets in joint session, Electoral College is not able to certify results to Congress because of actions by some or all states. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES votes to elect the President and VP -- EACH STATE GETS ONE VOTE.

If method #2 is used in January 2025, TRUMP WINS because there are more states whose House of Representatives delegations are controlled by Republicans.

Why is this a possibility? Because certain states are setting themselves up to not be able to certify results -- such as in Georgia where the state Board of Elections has voted to hand-count all ballots, a process that will take months, thereby missing the January deadline to report to the Electoral College, thereby throwing the 2024 Presidential election into the House. Arizona may do something similar. Montana has omitted Harris from the electronic ballot that was sent to absentee voters. This was their plan all along.

I hope I'm wrong.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
COULD work, but gotta think more about it; it's late. elleng Sep 2024 #1
Yep. It certainly is what B.See Sep 2024 #20
All those scammers look for some technicality that could give them a victory. captain queeg Sep 2024 #2
At which point, the next response will be: Mike Niendorff Sep 2024 #3
EXACTLY!!!!! PCIntern Sep 2024 #15
This is why Harris needs to win all the swing states SomedayKindaLove Sep 2024 #4
This is incorrect. Self Esteem Sep 2024 #5
What this poster said... pecosbob Sep 2024 #6
that is what I was thinking too. It only goes to Congress for a state vote if there's an electoral tie LymphocyteLover Sep 2024 #9
That's how I read it too. Liberal In Texas Sep 2024 #14
I've seen this a few times now, and AWESOME if that's accurate, but where can I find that information Grown2Hate Sep 2024 #17
I cannot image the American people would allow this to happen. Jmb 4 Harris-Walz Sep 2024 #7
If Republicans spent more energy C_U_L8R Sep 2024 #8
If states don't certify the 11/5 vote, and the election is thrown into the House, can those non-certifying states... Efilroft Sul Sep 2024 #10
Its important snowybirdie Sep 2024 #11
Dark Brandon was bestowed with extraordinary powers by SCROTUS. GreenWave Sep 2024 #12
Confusing for sure. My question would be, IF those states do not certify, bluestarone Sep 2024 #13
Trump's odd pitch: 'Our primary focus is not to get out the vote' LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2024 #16
Someone answer this for me... Mz Pip Sep 2024 #18
Republicans in swing states say they see scant signs of groups door-knocking for Trump LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2024 #19
You are wrong on Step 2 Kaleva Sep 2024 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is Trump's plan . . ...