Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Self Esteem

(2,248 posts)
4. No. It just means crosstabs are not to be trusted.
Wed Sep 25, 2024, 05:11 PM
Sep 2024

There's a difference between a poll specifically sampling a demographic, as the Harvard Poll does here, and the crosstabs of a poll sampling that demographic.

Crosstabs generally have a high MOE because they're a subset of the population polled. Quinnipiac polled 1,728 likely voters.

I don't have the total breakdown of what percentage of those polled were 18-34 but in 2020, 18-29 made up 17% of the electorate and 30-44 23%, so, let's just assume 18-34 was 20% of the poll.

That means it's just 346 total from that group.

Which likely has a significant MOE.

Couple that with the fact Biden did worse among 30-44 (+6) than he did 18-29 (+24), his lead among 18-34 was probably well below the +24 he received...likely closer to +15 or so, which is likely where Harris is at nationally. Add the MOE (which is frequently +/-10 on crosstabs and her lead could be +13 among this group ... which is a lot closer.

The Quinnipiac Poll might be an outlier but the fact other polls show the race tightening makes me thin it probably is closer to what we're seeing than not.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New Harvard Poll Shows Ha...»Reply #4