Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Redleg

(7,035 posts)
9. Good point- maybe the Dems should cry "rigged debate"
Tue Oct 1, 2024, 04:09 PM
Oct 2024

but we won't because Walz is going to prevail anyway.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So I guess no one is supposed to notice [View all] senseandsensibility Oct 2024 OP
I don't "get" this no fact checking BS. 3catwoman3 Oct 2024 #1
The journalists should be ashamed senseandsensibility Oct 2024 #2
They'll get paid one way or another Quanto Magnus Oct 2024 #19
Walz should say something like. JD Vance, you lying sack of shit everything you said is a lie, then go onto his answer Walleye Oct 2024 #3
I'm for it! senseandsensibility Oct 2024 #4
Yep from this point on, we should not give a good green shit what Republicans have to say Walleye Oct 2024 #5
This is what I was thinking birdographer Oct 2024 #10
If they aren't going to fact check then they need to give more time for rebuttals Redleg Oct 2024 #6
Unfortunately even if more response time is allowed senseandsensibility Oct 2024 #7
Good point- maybe the Dems should cry "rigged debate" Redleg Oct 2024 #9
If there Rebl2 Oct 2024 #16
OR, all Walz has to do is note every lie and just SAY it's a lie, then proceed with his answer. ancianita Oct 2024 #8
And that's a lie... and that's a lie... tavernier Oct 2024 #25
Yep. It will take all of 30 secs of his time, and then he can quickly get on with content that wins him the debate. ancianita Oct 2024 #26
Walz can sing The Boxer SomedayKindaLove Oct 2024 #29
Money & Fame. Clouds Passing Oct 2024 #11
I plan to watch on MSNBC. PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2024 #12
I believe Rebl2 Oct 2024 #13
++ appalachiablue Oct 2024 #24
Walz should just keep shaking his head and each time prior to answering the question NoMoreRepugs Oct 2024 #14
Two words...and then go on with his answer hvn_nbr_2 Oct 2024 #23
Walz should DownriverDem Oct 2024 #15
In classic debates... is the moderator supposed to fact check? WarGamer Oct 2024 #17
I agree and I do think at the very least a fact checker should be live posting on the screen Bev54 Oct 2024 #18
Give each lie about seven words: "He lied about the numbers", "He lied: he told Congress to block the immigration bill" Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2024 #20
Going forward, I think the party should establish published guidelines listing what is and is not acceptable. BadgerMom Oct 2024 #21
Another scenario I can see happening Chili Pepper Oct 2024 #22
Yeah, what's to stop him? senseandsensibility Oct 2024 #41
If I were Walz I would steamroll through the debate. I would not adhere to time and interrupt lies. Period. themaguffin Oct 2024 #27
So what is the purpose of the current media. Biophilic Oct 2024 #28
Realize positive and ever-growing value for shareholders LearnedHand Oct 2024 #36
A bit frustrating isn't it? Biophilic Oct 2024 #40
But this is in line with the American Political System, no? Montauk6 Oct 2024 #30
If facts don't matters journalism merely provides a venue. No value-add. unblock Oct 2024 #31
They haven't had journalistic responsibility since the Telecommunications Act of 1996 LearnedHand Oct 2024 #38
CBS Offers QR Code to Fact-Check VP Debate in Real Time Jmb 4 Harris-Walz Oct 2024 #32
Don't bother fact checking. kacekwl Oct 2024 #33
Walz just needs to be himself. carpetbagger Oct 2024 #34
NEVER argue from their framework LearnedHand Oct 2024 #35
Trump lied quite a lot in his debate with Kamala Harris. Morbius Oct 2024 #37
David Muir and the female journalist (sorry, forgot her name) senseandsensibility Oct 2024 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So I guess no one is supp...»Reply #9