Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
15. Yeah, let's screw farmers and endangered species downstream,
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 06:50 AM
Dec 2012

So that millions of humans can live in an environment that simply doesn't support that many people.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

First I've heard of it... CaliforniaPeggy Dec 2012 #1
They've been around for a while, CalPeg; elleng Dec 2012 #3
I believe you, my dear elleng! CaliforniaPeggy Dec 2012 #5
Probably right that they wouldn't want to give it up, elleng Dec 2012 #8
Alternatively, move the people out of Arizona and southern California FarCenter Dec 2012 #2
Good luck with that! Ain't gonna happen. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Dec 2012 #6
If they run out of water they won't have a choice snooper2 Dec 2012 #28
Wouldn't it be amazing if people had to live where the water was? amandabeech Dec 2012 #27
Pumping water uphill 5000 feet takes a lot of energy. hunter Dec 2012 #4
There are years in which the Missouri has more than it can TwilightGardener Dec 2012 #7
The rich will take the water - period. taught_me_patience Dec 2012 #9
The Missouri is pretty dry right now pscot Dec 2012 #10
Drought threatens barge traffic on Mississippi River Berlum Dec 2012 #13
Indeed they would. n/t janx Dec 2012 #30
Refine the idea. silverweb Dec 2012 #11
NAWAPA (R) Berlum Dec 2012 #12
there`s not enough water in the Missouri river madrchsod Dec 2012 #14
Yeah, let's screw farmers and endangered species downstream, MadHound Dec 2012 #15
Los Angeles was planning on tapping into the Snake River (Oregon/Idaho) many years ago IDemo Dec 2012 #16
what a great way to screw the farmers. xmas74 Dec 2012 #17
This while downstream states on the Mississippi are howling for more releases for shipping? hatrack Dec 2012 #18
The Great Lakes have had been mentioned as a source of water for other parts of the country as well a kennedy Dec 2012 #19
Ain't goin' happen: hedgehog Dec 2012 #20
i thought something was passed to protect the water leftyohiolib Dec 2012 #25
A new pipeline? What could possibly go wrong? n/t unhappycamper Dec 2012 #21
another insane idea newfie11 Dec 2012 #22
Anyone want to take a guess as to the cost of pumping all that water uphill 600 miles? hedgehog Dec 2012 #23
Maybe we should first tell people in Denver to say goodbye to their lawns! hedgehog Dec 2012 #24
I wonder if the folks downstream from Kansas City know about this idea? Sienna86 Dec 2012 #26
You are thinking about the Mississippi-- janx Dec 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT: A 600-mile pipeline ...»Reply #15