Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.

Edit history

Cannot view edit history for self-deleted messages.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does any agency in this country give a fuck about the rule of law? [View all] onecaliberal Oct 2024 OP

I thought laws had to deemed "unconstitutional" by the supreme court.. Think. Again. Oct 2024 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2024 #4

Just wait until exPresident Biden markodochartaigh Oct 2024 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2024 #14

Unconstitutional laws stay on the books until they're repealed. onenote Oct 2024 #7

The Logan Act will likely never be challenged before SCOTUS. TomSlick Oct 2024 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2024 #15

Bingo. Think. Again. Oct 2024 #20

That would be ethically suspect. TomSlick Oct 2024 #21

Why do people keep trying to pretend itcs known to be unconstitutional? Think. Again. Oct 2024 #23

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2024 #24

There is a factual basis for a charge under the Logan Act. TomSlick Oct 2024 #26

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2024 #27

I agree there is a factual basis, just not a sound legal one. TomSlick Oct 2024 #29

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2024 #35

I've been wrong before. TomSlick Oct 2024 #36

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2024 #37

It is certainly NOT "clearly unconstitutional".. Think. Again. Oct 2024 #22

The "clearly unconstitutional" comment was clearly just my opinion. TomSlick Oct 2024 #25

Can you muster an agrument as to why it wouldn't be? Think. Again. Oct 2024 #28

Ah, Thank You! Think. Again. Oct 2024 #8

It hasn't. H2O Man Oct 2024 #16

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2024 #17

K&R Blue Owl Oct 2024 #2

This is what happens D_Master81 Oct 2024 #9

Nope angrychair Oct 2024 #18

Unconstitutional or not, slightlv Oct 2024 #19

Oh, she clearly misunderstands birdographer Oct 2024 #30

I have an idea liberalgunwilltravel Oct 2024 #31

The general consensus in the legal world DetroitLegalBeagle Oct 2024 #32

The Logan act is/was a feel good law. republianmushroom Oct 2024 #34